Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Producing hydrogen from sea water
Chemistry World ^ | 28 April 2010 | Mike Brown

Posted on 05/03/2010 10:50:42 PM PDT by neverdem

A new catalyst that generates hydrogen from sea water has been developed by scientists in the US. This new metal-oxo complex displays high catalytic activity and stability, whilst being low cost, the researchers say.

Hydrogen is very attractive as a clean source of power. Currently, it is produced by natural gas reforming - where steam is reacted with methane in the presence of a nickel catalyst to form hydrogen - but this method produces the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.

Jeffrey Long and colleagues from the University of California, Berkeley, prepared a simple molybdenum-oxo complex that can serve as an electrocatalyst, reducing the energy required to generate hydrogen from water on a mercury electrode. As an abundant metal, molybdenum is much cheaper than precious metal catalysts where the costs associated with large scale hydrogen production would be high.

molybdenum-oxo species generates hydrogen from sea water

The team's molybdenum-oxo species generates hydrogen from sea water

© Nature

Long explains that the stability of the catalyst is due to a ligand that bonds to the molybdenum in five places (pentadentate) making it a very strong complex. 'The molecule is very robust and is stable in aqueous conditions for long periods of time so we don't see degradation of the catalytic activity over three days of running the reaction,' he says.  

Significantly, Long's catalyst is also stable in the presence of impurities that can be found in the ocean, meaning that sea water can be used without pre-treatment. The team used a sample of California sea water in the system and found the results to be similar to the results obtained for water at neutral pH. In addition, no other electrolyte is necessary when using sea water, which helps reduce costs and removes any need for organic acids or solvents that could degrade the catalyst.

'The work clearly demonstrates that the molybdenum-oxo complex explored shows good catalytic activity, with at least an order of magnitude higher turnover frequency [the speed at which a catalytic cycle is completed] than alternative catalysts quoted,' says Bruce Ewan, an expert in hydrogen production and renewable energy at the University of Sheffield, UK.   'This new catalyst also opens up new possibilities as a catalytic agent in other proton reducing scenarios,' he adds.

Long and his team hope to develop this system so that 'in the future a catalyst like this could be used in conjunction with a solar cell to produce hydrogen,' he explains. The team is now working on modifying the catalyst to reduce the potential at which the electrochemical reaction proceeds and make the system more efficient.

 

References

H I Karunadasa, C J Chang and J R Long, Nature, 2010, DOI: 10.1038/nature08969

Also of interest

Yellow beaker

Urine turned into hydrogen fuel

02 July 2009

Whizz electrocatalyst frees the hydrogen from 'liquid gold'


Sun shining on water

Breakthrough catalyst for splitting water

31 July 2008

Mild electrolysis system boosts hopes for artificial photosynthesis


The Hydrosol II plant (foreground) concentrates the sun's rays

Cracking water with sunlight

28 March 2008

World's largest thermochemical solar hydrogen plant opens



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: catalysts; chemistry; energy; hydrogen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
A molecular molybdenum-oxo catalyst for generating hydrogen from water

This abstract is so PC that it hurts.

1 posted on 05/03/2010 10:50:43 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A new catalyst that generates hydrogen from sea water has been developed by scientists in the US. This new metal-oxo complex displays high catalytic activity and stability, whilst being low cost, the researchers say.

"whilst"?

2 posted on 05/03/2010 10:53:32 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Global Warming™ - Too big to fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If we use sea water to create hydrogen, and make the oceans lower, that should help counteract the melting ice caps from global warming. We will live!


3 posted on 05/03/2010 10:54:37 PM PDT by Defiant (De-fund the left. Refund the American taxpayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The process is called electrolysis.


4 posted on 05/03/2010 10:56:20 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

in a 100 years, i have no doubt in my mind that the future generation of environmentalist will find fault in the technology thats powering society, even if we adopt everything they support now e.g ethanol, solar panel.


5 posted on 05/03/2010 11:02:04 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Couldn’t they have just set the oil spill ablaze?


6 posted on 05/03/2010 11:05:29 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

“The process is called electrolysis.”

Yes, and it appears that this catalyst is somewhat more efficient at driving the conversion. This rather begs the question of how much energy is required to convert h20 to hydrogen. One doesn’t get hydrogen for free, and you have to drive the reaction with some form of energy (mostly coal in the US). In the end, I suspect that there is no net energy gain by using hydrogen, as you gotta’ burn the coal to produce the electrons, that drive the reaction.

I’m afraid they’ll have to come up with more than a new catalyst to make hydrogen an economic, or environmental success.

It will cerainly make folks feel good though. ;-)


7 posted on 05/03/2010 11:13:23 PM PDT by Habibi ("It is vain to do with more what can be done with less." - William of Occam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

LOL

We used to use Drano and tin foil - then run the rsulting H2 thru a tube full of soap flakes to dry it and then fill ballons.

Tied shut

with cannon fuse

which we lit off

just before releasing them.


8 posted on 05/03/2010 11:42:45 PM PDT by ASOC (I am available for spill response work, all I ask is $800/day plus expenses.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

bflr


10 posted on 05/03/2010 11:44:29 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

mark for later.


11 posted on 05/03/2010 11:45:15 PM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

intelligence looks good on ya


12 posted on 05/03/2010 11:51:04 PM PDT by advertising guy (Consumer Of Confiscated Liquers Czar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: ASOC

I knew a guy at college who used to do something like that. Only he put the tinfoil and drain cleaner in a plastic 2-liter and sealed it.

Boy howdy, was that thing loud when it went off...


14 posted on 05/04/2010 12:47:22 AM PDT by DemforBush (Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This abstract is so PC that it hurts.

Yes, many technical magazines have lefty editors. The rank and file society members of the respective magazines want the editors ousted. Some examples are: The Journal of the American Institute of Physics, Chemical Engineering News, Nature and Science

15 posted on 05/04/2010 12:52:14 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

So PC in fact he overlooks a very important fact in his first paragraph. The author wrote “ but this method produces the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.”

Well sonny, there is no more powerful and prevalent greenhouse gas than water vapour, and guess what’s produced when H2 is oxidized to release energy?!?!

Astoundingly weak.


16 posted on 05/04/2010 2:10:46 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Habibi
In the end, I suspect that there is no net energy gain by using hydrogen, as you gotta’ burn the coal to produce the electrons, that drive the reaction.

Obtaining hydrogen by electrosis cannot possibly result in any net energy gain. The hydrogen is an energy storage medium, like a rechargable battery, not an energy source and not a particularly efficient one. It does have the advantage of having higher energy density than batteries, though less than gasoline, iirc, measured in joules per kilogram. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_economy

17 posted on 05/04/2010 2:49:12 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Well sonny, there is no more powerful and prevalent greenhouse gas than water vapour,

The half life of a water molecule in the atmosphere is about a week, a molecule of CO2 about a century. Although molecule for molecule H2O is a more powerful greenhouse gas, it doesn't hang around nearly as long. When was the last time it hailed dry ice?

18 posted on 05/04/2010 2:51:41 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

You know, that statistic about the half life of a given molecule may or may not be correct. But why is it relevant? And do you have a citation for that? (I’m curious)

Also, last time I checked dry ice hail was not a part of the carbon cycle but rain/hail/snow/sleet clearly is a part of the H2O cycle.

I know it’s early, but what’s your point?

As an aside — IF we were to largely switch from carbon based fuels to hydrogen, we’d be pumping huge volumes of water vapor into the atmosphere and probably creating microclimates around major thoroughfares.

BTW, I am all in favor of efficient catalysis to produce hydrogen.


19 posted on 05/04/2010 3:00:53 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Energy out = energy in - losses


20 posted on 05/04/2010 3:06:06 AM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson