Skip to comments.
U.S. economy grows 3.2 pct in first three months of the year
The Washington Post ^
| April 30, 2010
Posted on 04/30/2010 5:53:37 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Edited on 04/30/2010 5:58:47 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
WASHINGTON - The U.S. economy grew at a slightly slower-than-expected pace in the first quarter, held back by inventories and exports, but resurgent consumer spending offered evidence of a sustainable recovery, a government report showed on Friday.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Rational Thought
Zero interest rates and 3.2 %is all they can get -we are fudged
To: MinorityRepublican
How much of that is government growth?
22
posted on
04/30/2010 6:46:17 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
To: apillar
A guy called Limbaugh yesterday and said his wife got one of the Census jobs and worked 2 weeks and was “pooled” for the next 4. They were still hiring and training them even though there wasn’t enough actual work to go around.
It takes them off the unemployment rolls and thats all that matters.
23
posted on
04/30/2010 6:47:43 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
To: GOPsterinMA
We lose @ half a million jobs a WEEK. This has been going on for months. These people are now dependent. Half the population was already dependent before the crash.
Our economy is in a downward spiral with no end in sight. Washington needs money - fast - all it can get. They've gained access to every workers private bank accounts through the Death Care bill. They're talking about forcing all those who earn a wage to get a national, biometric, ID card. They MUST know who has money, because they want it. They need it. They're struggling to survive.
If they were to admit it publically, there would be panic in the streets.
To: concerned about politics
Great points!
As far as panic in the streets goes, I’d substitute the words ‘massive deaths’ for ‘panic’.
25
posted on
04/30/2010 6:51:05 AM PDT
by
GOPsterinMA
(Paul Ryan/Greg Abbott in 2012.)
To: MinorityRepublican
What portion of this “growth” is attributable to government spending? 60%? 75%?
To: MinorityRepublican
Please remember that this recession has been going on for a long time. The year-to-year growth is a comparison to a very bad 2009.
To: MinorityRepublican
Well, so much for that blowhard Larry Kudlow’s V-shaped recovery that he’s been hard-selling like a Goldman-Sachs sleazebag for the last few months. I’d like to staple this report to his forehead, the windbag. He must be drinking again.
To: MinorityRepublican
A jobless recovery is recovery? Pffft...right.
To: qwertypie
Goldman-Sachs sleazebagDon't worry about them. This is to give the illusion they're political enemies. They're HEAVILY invested in Obomas Chicago Climate Exchange. They'll be well rewarded for cooperating and playing along as the boogie man.
Fanny and Freddy, the actual cause of the collapse, are also heavily invested in Obomas "Green Scheme" as well, but we can't have a leftist like Oboma bashing free housing for the poor, now can we?
If you were a Goldman Sachs big wing looking at 10 trillion dollars a year in profits from carbon credit sales, wouldn't you be willing to play along?
To: GeronL
How long until somebody suggests that the Census be conducted every year, instead of every ten years?
31
posted on
04/30/2010 7:06:41 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: SoFloFreeper
More than 100% of it.
We borrowed and spent over $400 billion in the quarter. Most of that didn't even show up in GDP, it effectively went into a black hole. I think we would have needed GDP +11% or more to show growth beyond that of the federal government's debt binge. Without the debt binge, GDP would have been negative.
To: DaisyCutter
Exactly. This GDP number is completely fudged with government spending of money we don't have. Our government is overtly publishing propaganda and outright lies in an effort to deceive the public.
Denninger has the real story on this GDP report: First Quarter 2010 GDP Advance
33
posted on
04/30/2010 7:19:24 AM PDT
by
Zeddicus
To: Sprite518
It will be revised downward, but Onada’s propaganda organs will not print that.
34
posted on
04/30/2010 7:37:28 AM PDT
by
dools007
To: MinorityRepublican
U.S. economy grows 3.2 pct in first three months of the year I. Do. Not. Believe. It.
Obama propaganda.
35
posted on
04/30/2010 7:38:28 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
("It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Jefferson)
To: MinorityRepublican
It’s all temporary...and will come crashing back to earth. Similar things happened during the Great Depression.
36
posted on
04/30/2010 7:39:18 AM PDT
by
surfer
(To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
To: Rational Thought
Ping. Unemployment rate has not materially slowed; home repo rate has not slowed; new home construction down, new/existing home sales down and manufacturing bellweathers cooper, silver and electrical demand are down. Add to this soaring debt and cost of government; plus the coming deluge of economy killers like Onadacare, VAT and tax and trade and even some otherwise brain dead dems can see the hand writing on the wall.
This will be life in America until the Marxist presidential usurper is removed from office.
37
posted on
04/30/2010 7:50:33 AM PDT
by
dools007
To: MinorityRepublican
In spite of everything the Dems do, the U.S. economy still tries to grow.
To: MinorityRepublican
To: MinorityRepublican
This is an excerpt from an analysis by Street Talk with Lance Roberts. This sounds credible to me. The "Street" and the financial media are portraying a totally misleading impression that the economy is now undergoing a normal recovery as each new piece of economic data is issued. At the same time the stock market has been in the process of pricing in the so‐called great news. Let's have a look at the actual numbers. 1) March retail sales were up 8.6% from the low a year earlier. However, this was still 3.6% below the peak sales in May 2008, almost two years ago. Moreover, sales are still slightly below the level reached back in December 2006, over three years earlier. Over the last 43 years retail sales had hardly ever gone down at all, even in recessions. 2) March industrial production (IP) was up 6.1% from the June trough, but was still down 9.1% from the top December 2007. At its current level IP is still where it was over 10 years ago in December 1999. Never since the depression in the 1930s has IP failed to exceed a level established 10 years earlier. 3) New orders for durable goods in February were up 12.8% from the low in March 2009, but were still 22% below the peak in late 2006. In fact orders are back at the same level as in the fall of 1997. 4) Initial weekly unemployment claims for the latest reported week are 456,000. Claims declined from a peak of 643,000 for the week ending March 29, 2009 to 477,000 on November 15. Since then, however, the number of claims has flattened out to a range between 439,000 and 490,000 weekly over the five‐month period. This is still a recessionary number. 5) March housing starts were up 31% from the low April 2009, but still down 72% from the peak in January 2006. Except for the current recession the number of starts in March was the lowest in any month over the last 51 years. 6) As reported today, existing home sales were 535,000, up 6.8% from the prior month and 19% from the low in late 2008. However, this was still 27% below the peak in late 2005. 7) New vehicle sales in March were at an annual rate of 11.8 million, up 13.5% from the prior month and 28% from the recession low. This is still well below the average of about 16 million vehicles between in the decade ending in 2007. 8) February personal income was up 11.9% from the trough in July 2009, but still 1.5% below the top in May 2008. At the current level personal income is 2% higher than a year earlier after being down for 12 consecutive months. Prior to the current recession personal income had never been down year‐over‐year in any month going back to 1960, and the current plus 2% is still at recessionary levels. 9) Payroll employment in March increased 162,000 leaving the total 8.3 million jobs below the peak reached in February 2008 and equal to the number of jobs back in October 1999. 10) February consumer credit was down 4% from a year earlier, the biggest decrease on a year‐to‐year basis since late in World War ll. The data cited here cover the major indicators of economic activity, and they paint a picture of an economy that has moved up, but only from extremely depressed figures to a point where they are merely less depressed. And keep in mind that this is the result of the most massive monetary and fiscal stimulus ever applied to a major economy. In our view the ability of the economy to undergo a sustained recovery without continued massive help is still questionable, and the data discussed in this comment doesn't even include the fiscal problems of the states, the deteriorating federal fiscal outlook, sovereign debt problems subject to potential global contagion, the Chinese housing bubble, and the increased threat of "beggar thy neighbor" nationalistic economic policies. At current levels the stock market is substantially overvalued and subject to severe downside risk.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson