Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: evets

I didn’t think carbon dating was that accurate.


4 posted on 04/27/2010 8:30:46 AM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dblshot

I met my match at EcarbonHarmony.com


9 posted on 04/27/2010 8:32:46 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dblshot

C14 (Carbon-14) dating is based on a ratio of C-14 to C-12, a ration that remains in stasis in living things but begins to decline at the death of the organism. Theoretically, so much isotopic decay occurs in half-life steps that at about 50,000 years there is nothing left of the original C-14. Therefore, C-14 should work great for near-term events 5000-10,000 years ago, but become dramatically less accurate going further back, and utterly useless after 50K years.


40 posted on 04/27/2010 8:48:56 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dblshot

“I didn’t think carbon dating was that accurate.”

Only for artifacts dated to be under 6,000 years of age.


181 posted on 04/27/2010 10:12:36 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson