Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dblshot

“I didn’t think carbon dating was that accurate.”

Only for artifacts dated to be under 6,000 years of age.


181 posted on 04/27/2010 10:12:36 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: truth_seeker
Only for artifacts dated to be under 6,000 years of age.

You and your pesky facts and logic and reason...;)

183 posted on 04/27/2010 10:15:14 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

>Only for artifacts dated to be under 6,000 years of age.

“Radiocarbon dating, or carbon dating, is a radiometric dating method that uses the naturally occurring radioisotope carbon-14 (14C) to determine the age of carbonaceous materials up to about 58,000 to 62,000 years.[1] Raw, i.e. uncalibrated, radiocarbon ages are usually reported in radiocarbon years “Before Present” (BP), “Present” being defined as AD 1950. Such raw ages can be calibrated to give calendar dates.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating


198 posted on 04/27/2010 10:28:10 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson