With all due respect and as former Merchant Mariners that we both are, would you mind to post YOUR similar credentials as Mario Apuzzo, Esq.'s since seems you have to be in judgment of his qualifications instead of bashing a lawyer who is trying to show the your C-i-C is NOT eligible for that high position. As far as I know, I think he is in a court appeal case right now???
I am NOT in that position to judge him negatively, but I'm looking forward to see your similar qualification posted here on line vs. Mario Apuzzo's!!!
What the relevance of my qualifications are with respect to Apuzzo's "esteemed" reputation, is elusive to me. His own credentials should speak for themselves. His own advertised areas of law do not include appellate, constitutional, election or immigration law - all areas that would presumably lend themselves to the subject-matter at hand.
Yes, he has moved for appeal of his cases dismissal by a lower court. My statement was self-evidently about previous cases to wit, I cannot find any record of his involvement in.
The argument saying that only constitutional attorneys can say what is plainly written in the US Constitution is all folly. The sacred document was written for the people to easily understand and not have some intermediary to tell you what it means. Anyone can understand it if they take the time to study the intent and meaning behind the written words.