[OldDeckHand]

"With all due respect and as former Merchant Mariners that we both are, would you mind to post YOUR similar credentials as Mario Apuzzo, Esq.'s since seems you have to be in judgment of his qualifications instead of bashing a lawyer who is trying to show the your C-i-C is NOT eligible for that high position. As far as I know, I think he is in a court appeal case right now???"

What the relevance of my qualifications are with respect to Apuzzo's "esteemed" reputation, is elusive to me. His own credentials should speak for themselves. His own advertised areas of law do not include appellate, constitutional, election or immigration law - all areas that would presumably lend themselves to the subject-matter at hand.

Yes, he has moved for appeal of his cases dismissal by a lower court. My statement was self-evidently about previous cases to wit, I cannot find any record of his involvement in.

[Uncle Chip]

What the relevance of my qualifications are with respect to Apuzzo's "esteemed" reputation

You are the one criticizing his qualifications. So post your qualifications to criticize. You've already admitted that you were not trained in the Constitution. So then what is your authority to say anything in that regard???

[danamco]

What the relevance of my qualifications are with respect to Apuzzo's "esteemed" reputation, is elusive to me.

Elusive?

Is that not close to Clarence Thomas' Evasive??

See post 231???