Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; OldDeckHand; tired_old_conservative

Goodnight, butterdezillion! You sound like a complete idiot. Do you realize that?

The Congress of the U.S. didn’t certify your election as POTUS and you weren’t sworn into the office of POTUS by the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS, but guess who was? That’s why his orders are presumed lawful down the chain of command. He’s the sitting President of the U.S. until and unless he is impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.

It’s really not that complicated.


448 posted on 04/26/2010 7:19:53 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan; butterdezillion
Goodnight, butterdezillion! You sound like a complete idiot. Do you realize that?

BTW, B.T. that is a title YOU have earned here long ago without any competition!!!

Article 138 is one of the most powerful rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), but it is one of the rights least known and least used by military personnel. Under Article 138 of the UCMJ, “any member of the armed forces who believes himself (or herself) wronged by his (or her) commanding officer” may request redress. If such redress is refused, a complaint may be made and a superior officer must “examine into the complaint.”

Article 138 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) gives every member of the Armed Forces the right to complain that he or she was wronged by his or her commanding officer. The right even extends to those subject to the UCMJ on inactive duty for training.

455 posted on 04/26/2010 8:27:21 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Being certified and sworn is not what the Constitution says is the requirement. Being natural born, old enough, and a resident long enough is.

And we know for a fact that none of those things were even CHECKED - because Hawaii law says that a legal determination has to be made by an administrative or judicial person or body when an amended certificate is involved. That is precisely what Obama has been spending big bucks to PREVENT.

Nancy Pelosi’s certification for Hawaii was absolutely perjury. Even if she had looked at everything herself (which she didn’t) she couldn’t make a ruling on it because she is LEGISLATIVE, not administrative or judicial.

So what she says in “certifying” the election means absolutely diddly-squat legally or otherwise, because we already know that she perjured herself in that whole process.


459 posted on 04/26/2010 11:03:27 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson