Interesting reading the back and forth.
I believe you have nailed the essence of the question with your above statement. But the bottom line as I read all the back and forth is that it isn't the job of the military [UCMJ] to make that determination but rather it belongs in the civilian domain [Congress or the Judiciary]. Just my take on the back and forth.
Have a nice evening.
Pretty much. And the case Lakin brings presents no legal basis for questioning Obama’s legitimacy anyway.
What you say may well be the case, but before the military can convict a man they better get the answer from the civilian entities regarding whether Obama is a Constitutional president.
Hawaii law says that because Obama’s BC is amended, no legal conclusion regarding his birth can be made without all the birth documents being presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body. And we know that hasn’t happened. Obama refuses to LET that happen.
So regardless of who signed what certification and who made what oath of office - what is legally required to verify Obama’s eligibility has never happened. His status as a Constitutional president has never even been CHECKED - much less confirmed.
That is what Lakin is asking to have done. Maybe a civil court has to do the actual determination. So far they have all refused to do so. But I don’t see how the military could convict a man of disobeying legal, Consitutional orders if the Constitutionality of the person pretending to be CIC has never even been checked.
“I believe you have nailed the essence of the question with your above statement. But the bottom line as I read all the back and forth is that it isn’t the job of the military [UCMJ] to make that determination but rather it belongs in the civilian domain [Congress or the Judiciary]. Just my take on the back and forth.”
Then it’s going to be interesting to see what Blago can accomplish with his filing notion Thursday for subpoena the usurper to testify:
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam&id=7400895