Posted on 04/19/2010 2:45:29 PM PDT by Christian Cage
Sarah Palin’s goal is to shatter the glass ceiling.
They threatened to arrest him.
The new “he said, she said”:
“She said, and that’s good enough for us.”
Brown University....is that where they build dykes?
if this guy wants to fight this ruling, good for him......have at it....
does he think that fathers are not going to support and defend their dtrs?....even if it means only applying pressure at her college to kick someone out?....
I would hope most freeper men would do the same
I do remember the seamy details (drunk slut left by her “friends” on a boys dorm room floor, etc.) and I don't remember the slut's name, but I certainly DO remember that boy's name and his home town. Just disgraceful.
I hope this kid in the article takes them to the cleansers.
Due process is a scarce commodity in the world of bureaucracy. Brown being a private leftwing sewer, this poor sap may be SOL. Take heed where you go to school.
That article could have been written by me in 1998. I was actually aware of this stuff back in the 80’s but did not think it would hit me. Then it did in 1997. My wife of 20 years (and we had three daughters) divorced me “without cause” and I found my situation was not only very much like the one in this story, but is playing out the way this story does: http://www.fredoneverything.net/Divorce.shtml
The good news today is the loss of prosperity in our nation is taking the wind out of feminists sails. Unfortunately, a lot of bad things will come of it at first. Like taking chemo to cure cancer, the cure can seem almost as devastating as the disease. But it is the natural course of things.
This nation/culture is heating up. When things reach the boiling point and come back down again, there will be little room for feminism for many generations.
That is, assuming we are not on the precipice of the Lords return. Then it will turn out, ah, differently. I don’t know which it is though. It could be just another upheaval like WWII. Either way, it will go very, VERY badly for a LOT of people.
And see my tag line.
Umm, we socons despise radical feminism.
The issue isn't so much her motives, but the school's apparent "guilty until proved innocent" approach to dealing with it.
“If SoCons are intent on restoring traditional roles (most aren’t nearly as strong in their support of that as they think) then they must understand that a patriarchal system in the old style is the only way that will happen and enabling feminism at any level is a recipe for the kind of society divided against itself that we currently face.”
You’ve got most of us mixed with someone else. I’m a socon and I agree with the biblical principles that a man is supposed to be the head of his household, as Christ is the head of the Church.
“chivalry as a concept by which we abide”
Ahh, take a chair with the radfems. The radfems despise chivalry because they believe that treating women with the appropriate respect is wrong.
Chivalry is essential to tearing down radical feminism. If a lady is treated properly by her boyfriend in the first place then she isn’t going to be a fertile ground for feminist ideals later on.
Chivalry makes radical feminism useless because it exposes the lie that women are mistreated and helpless.
You're right ... and even more important, if a girl and her mother are treated well by her father, she's not going to be open to radical feminist propaganda.
No, they probably dont like it which may be the problem.Not enough carpet involved.
We know what you think. The laws are weighted a particular direction, as is the culture, just because there are a bunch of a-hole men out there doesn’t mean you should incent bad behavior on the part of any particular group.
You don’t understand the point. Chivalry now manifests itself in behavior that reinforces the worst social pathologies that are being cultivated in women in contemporary society.
Meaning, you get echoes of chivalric behavior when men support laws to “help women” that are actually codifying feminine superiority.
Why do you think many feminist lawyer groups are AGAINST reform of alimony laws, changing child custody (shared parenting, etc) and other equalizing measures? Because, while they may ridicule ‘chivalry’ in interpersonal relations, they are for its installment as a legal regime and many SOCon politicians fall right in line BECAUSE they still entertain CHIVALRIC notions of femininity, sexual virtue, and male protectiveness over females.
Also, what is the “consent to each step of the process” mode of sexual thinking but a legalistic, distorted version of chivalry? Same thing with SoCon and RadFem alliances on pornography (Though there are ‘sex-positive’ feminists these days who are the opposite, IN SOME respects)
Dispense with these precepts, for they are being used to make war against your sons. BTW, they also make your sons look weak to women and turn them into husbands who will be left. But hey, don’t worry about the destruction of wealth when your son gets divorced, the taking of his children even when he wants them and the high depression and suicide rates.
Don’t confuse chivalry with “dominance,” “leadership” of the couple or “alphaness.” There was a time you could blend them but very few can get away with that now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.