Posted on 04/17/2010 11:20:03 PM PDT by Nachum
The blogosphere abhors a vacuum. So when the mainstream media (MSM) leave holes in a given narrative -- in this case, the biography of the president -- bloggers individually, incrementally, and indefatigably strive to fill in the blanks -- sometimes successfully, sometimes less so.
In his comprehensive, 600-plus-page biography of Barack Obama titled The Bridge, New Yorker editor David Remnick lays down the baseline of what the mainstream media know about the president -- or at least what they want us to know.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
That’s gross! He is unreal!!!
When did they start circumcising arms?
Thanks. I’ll check it out. Do you happen to have a link?
If you’re right, that’s scary. It’s especially scary that it was suppressed by our esteemed MSM. Who is behind this guy?
I hope you continue to read through the thread.
“When did they start circumcising arms?”
Maybe it’s a muslim thing.
ROFL!!!
Look at this page of the thread and the 100s page, it’s been posted quite a few times. There are different opinions about the fingers, but the photo speaks for itself.
LOLOLOLOL
Can I puke now?
yechhhhh
Uuuh too much.
When did they start circumcising arms?
“”Maybe its a muslim thing.””
ROFL!!!
- - - - - - - - -
Well, they cut off heads....LOLOLOLOL.
I missed out on the Christian in Texas morphosis. Can you explain?
It is the first have heard of the picture being photoshopped, but that doesn’t mean anything. Just calling it like I see it, LOL!
I’ll leave the photoshop debate to others.
Well, the Paki guy has way too many fingers on his right hand and I can see an arm and two fingers behind Obama’s leg.
All flesh colored, and I can see a whitish area that looks like the square face of a watch on the wrist. I enlarge them to look.
So, he can’t have three arms, the Paki can’t have 9 fingers and anyone who thinks it’s another ‘organ’ is delusional, lololol. He would be so proud.
So something isn’t right and it wasn’t nature.
LMAO! That was the funniest thing I have read in a long time.
LOL. Well, you started it and it just took it’s natural course, once maggief mentioned Muslim’s...lol.
Might not be natural, but makes for good laughs. Sometimes it’s all about the laugh.
:-)
LOL! We go down that road quicker than most, don’t we?
Wouldn’t have it any other way.
[Sometimes its all about the laugh.]
I guess that’s where I disagree BOR.
There are right times to laugh, but when some ignore evidence and do it to make fun of something, then it’s not right.
We’re not 14yr olds anymore.
But - I take things seriously, lol.
You betcha and I wouldn't want to change us one iota! LOL.
Correction: The media has covered for Obama, so it is unlikely they will expose any infidelity and apologize for it if they do.
But it's a jump to say Obama's gay
That's a good one. Just because he has brought in some of the most extreme gay activists to work in his administration, why should we not question his own sexuality? After bringing in gay activist Kevin Jennings, lesbian activist Chai Feldblum, and now the potention Supreme Court nominee, a leftist, gay judge from San Francisco Liu it is abundantly clear that he has GREAT sympathy for homosexuals.
If you realize that people are likely to assume the worst about those they don't like, shouldn't that make you mistrust some of the conclusions people jump to about enemies or opponents?
I don't have to "assume" anything. I have spent the last 65 weeks documenting the malfeasance and lies of this administration. It has been quite easy to predict their attacks on Israel, their wanton broadsides against the medical and insurance industry, and their attempt to unilaterally disarm the US. It is all there, in black and white for anyone with a brain who wants to read. BHO and his supporters have done their best to obfuscate his extremist wackjob past.
If YOU have a bias, perhaps you should be honest and state it up front as we here state ours. We are proudly conservative and the president is decidedly NOT.
Perhaps the worst is true, but if you always get to the worst conclusion first, aren't you likely to be wrong a lot of the time?
There is no question the worst is true. That is why millions are marching on Washington. We are in the right and we won't stand for this nasty bunch that have infested our government to get away with our freedom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.