Posted on 04/17/2010 11:20:03 PM PDT by Nachum
The blogosphere abhors a vacuum. So when the mainstream media (MSM) leave holes in a given narrative -- in this case, the biography of the president -- bloggers individually, incrementally, and indefatigably strive to fill in the blanks -- sometimes successfully, sometimes less so.
In his comprehensive, 600-plus-page biography of Barack Obama titled The Bridge, New Yorker editor David Remnick lays down the baseline of what the mainstream media know about the president -- or at least what they want us to know.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Right. His will leave no doubt for everyone, but it’ll blow up the thread for dial-up users.
I don’t recall what Maggie’s photo looks like, will have to check back later.
Hope this doesn’t post twice, thought I pressed ‘post’ already!
That photo is NOT photoshopped. It was/is all over the internet from reputable news sources along with stories and it was always the same. The only photoshopped one was from the NT Times and they cut the Paki out and the deletion of the Paki was obvious.
Exactly!
Indeed, and that picture is NOT photoshopped.
Well if the Paki has two clasped hands on his knee and Obama has an arm and two fingers laying in his lap, then the picture HAS to be photoshopped, right?
______________
NO! It is not photoshopped! Stop assuming they are holding hands.
There have been many here who are certain that some AP photos are photoshopped mojitojoe.
If people are missing the extra fingers and the arm and fingers in his lap on THIS forum, then they may have been missed by many on other sites too and many intend to deceive on purpose.
I’m not an expert but surely you can’t believe the two fingers and the arm on the other side of his knee are anything else but two fingers and an arm??? Lol.
I’m just stating what I see and I have pretty good eyes.
Maybe the arm and 2 fingers were photshopped in then, did that ever occur to you? I don’t think any of it is photoshopped. It is what it is and I can’t say for certainty that I see the 2 holding hands even from the enlarged versions. This is the first time anyone has ever questioned the authenticity of that photo due to the fact that it is and was all over the internet and in many newspapers, etc. along with the identification of the Pakistani.
[NO! It is not photoshopped! Stop assuming they are holding hands.]
OK, lol, the Paki must have ten fingers on his right arm then?? Others have enlarged it and shown it before.
NO! You are incorrect. The photo shop was done by the NY Times. They cropped it and shopped it to show him alone on the couch. The pictures is real.
Frank Marshall Davis and Stanley Dunham the grandfather shared more than marijuana, whiskey and communism.
Oh my, you couldn't be more wrong about that. It has been enlarged by others and been shown by many who said it had to be photoshopped. Please, I'm not lying to you, I've read that over and over.
There is no need for you and I to argue about it mojitojoe, let's just post the pictures and let others judge for themselves, ok?
I wasn’t referring to the cropped image from the NY times.
One comment is starting to get confused with another now.
Let’s just let others judge the photos that have been posted.
There are photos of him with her before they were married. Plenty of them. None of her pregnant that I know of but that would be easy to search for. Just use her name and the year she would have been pregnant and see what come up. She may not have allowed pics when she was pregnant. Some women don’t and if there are any, she might not have released them.
No woman has come forward and said I dated him.
His hookup with Michelle was arranged out of the agency of Dohrn partner of the bisexual Ayers.
First gay latte president.
President Ga Ga.
I have heard that blacks are well endowed, but come on it couldn't be that long.
Some men are heterosexual, and some men are homosexual, and some men don't think about sex at all. They become lawyers. - Woody Allen
If you realize that people are likely to assume the worst about those they don't like, shouldn't that make you mistrust some of the conclusions people jump to about enemies or opponents? If you see your own bias, don't you try to correct for it, just as you'd try to correct for someone else's. Perhaps the worst is true, but if you always get to the worst conclusion first, aren't you likely to be wrong a lot of the time?
President Ga Ga.
That’s good.
So you think 0bama is not a fag?
It’s totally obvious he is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.