Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama says nuke summit made US, world more secure
Associated Press ^ | 4-13-10 | ROBERT BURNS

Posted on 04/13/2010 3:18:42 PM PDT by Justaham

WASHINGTON (AP) - In full accord on a global threat, world leaders endorsed President Barack Obama's call for securing all nuclear materials from terrorists within four years at a 47-nation summit on Tuesday. They offered few specifics for achieving that goal, but Obama declared "the American people will be safer and the world will be more secure" as a result.

Obama had called the summit to focus world attention on keeping dangerous materials out of terrorist hands, a peril he termed the greatest threat facing all nations and a "cruel irony of history" after mankind had survived the Cold War and decades of fear stoked by a U.S.-Soviet arms race.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/13/2010 3:18:42 PM PDT by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Justaham

What ILLEGAL addicting drug is he on?


2 posted on 04/13/2010 3:19:34 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Duck...and cover!


3 posted on 04/13/2010 3:20:38 PM PDT by LRS (Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

More secure for Islam and Marxism.


4 posted on 04/13/2010 3:21:23 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

He’s full of you know what.


5 posted on 04/13/2010 3:22:39 PM PDT by bergmeid (Fumigate Washington NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
The biggest accomplishment at this "summit", which appears to have been attended by a single nuclear power (us), is that they agreed to hold another one in two years.

The finger sandwiches must've been exceptional...

6 posted on 04/13/2010 3:23:28 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Obama has this summit thing down well. Gotta problem. Just summit.

Health care summit. Jobs summit. Small business summit. And now the nuclear summit.

I feel more taken care of already.

7 posted on 04/13/2010 3:26:03 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

“Trust me. I know what I’m doing...I’ve been a community organizer, fer Chrissake!”


8 posted on 04/13/2010 3:28:25 PM PDT by Clioman (wHAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
.<

9 posted on 04/13/2010 3:31:22 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
In full accord on a global threat, world leaders endorsed President Barack Obama's call for securing all nuclear materials from terrorists within four years at a 47-nation summit on Tuesday.

I'd like the faux journalist who wrote this piece of syrupy, Pravda-esque puffery to explain to me how there can be "full accord" when the article itself references the unresolved issue of, um, Iran.

10 posted on 04/13/2010 3:31:52 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Think Neville Chamberlain: "Peace in our time!"

Two equally foolish leftist optimists.

11 posted on 04/13/2010 3:33:30 PM PDT by JustTheTruth (States Rights: Save Our Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

Don’t forget the beer summit.


12 posted on 04/13/2010 3:56:52 PM PDT by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: livius
The Iranians and North Koreans promised that they would behave themselves. That's enough evidence for dear reader to proclaim he achieved world peace.
13 posted on 04/13/2010 4:22:03 PM PDT by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Yeah, it made the world safer, by weakening our country.


14 posted on 04/13/2010 4:22:28 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

So, “…more secure…”

For who, this POS obviously is not interested in America or for freedom around the world. Think about this, the Chinese can throw 100M extra men in to a major war without worrying about demographics; that’s the whole male population of America. Yet the agreement bound the US only and was with Russia, no one else. So, whose side is this guy really on; figure it out.


15 posted on 04/13/2010 5:18:33 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

This is a community organizer to-the-core M.O.

He knows no other method.

Get the folks to gather, sit around and jack their jaws for a while, declare success, and plan for a future circle jerk.

Socialist scum.


16 posted on 04/13/2010 5:31:59 PM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in democrat stands for patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson