Why is it that the ONLY REAL LEADERS that I can see in the Republican party are WOMEN?
Not that having women in leadership is a problem, but, as Denny Kenaston would say, “WHERE ARE THE MEN?”
Other than that, I could support Liz Cheney, Michelle Bachman, or Sarah Palin as president/vice-president, not necessarily in that order, and in any combination.
(See: Women's liberation movement)
Assertive, confident women are praised; assertive, confident men are attacked and feared. (Speaking about our society in general, post-women's-lib...)
After decades of boys and men being pushed toward passivity, what else do we expect?
Who is Denny Kenaston?:-)
The men are busy working hard, holding down the fort, etc. Mike Pence is vocal on his Facebook page, has held pressers and I’m looking forward to HIS speech at the conference too.
I’m looking at this gender-wise but in terms of leadership skills.
Guess you have already forgotten Ryan. What a shame.
“Why is it that the ONLY REAL LEADERS that I can see in the Republican party are WOMEN?”
Hmmm, I sense a bumper sticker -
“Our women have more b*lls than the entire set of democratic (er, communist) party males.”