I got confused with this,
“I’ve been thinking that Obama may have been born in transit. It makes sense because under standard procedures, the final destination, so to speak, can be legally claimed as the place of birth. A ship pass, plane ticket or a captain’s affadavit might have been all that was needed to ‘verify’ the birth. The port of departure then becomes the city of birth (and no hospital, doctor or midwife).”
So which are you saying is the place of birth? the Destination or the Departure?
Stanley Ann has been proven to have been in Seattle less than 2 weeks after the little bastard was born, she enrolled at UW
her entire life was flaky. that is why he is such a POS and Liar
Good catch. I meant to say the point of arrival. I'm trying to do a little too much multitasking and mixed up the appropriate term. I think butterdezillion or someone had posted some vital records procedures and it mentioned how you handle en route births. Where the baby arrives is where the place of birth is listed. But, keep in mind, the baby might have actually been born anywhere along the way, so all they have is the mother's word ... maybe a ship's captain (if he or she actually witnessed the birth).
Stanley Ann has been proven to have been in Seattle less than 2 weeks after the little bastard was born, she enrolled at UW.
Right. She might have been there well before the little bastard was born. Or it might not even be her baby. Everything about these people is the perfect storm of ambiguities. Her inability to deal with a poopy diaper for a baby she should have been with for at least a couple of weeks is very odd.