I know, and I believe they were inserted by relatives as well. It really doesn’t matter if actual, saved, personal copies of the newspapers from that month(including that day) differ from the microfilm/microfiche, now does it?
What that would prove is that there was a concentrated effort by public officials to commit fraud upon the people of the United States of America. They need to build some more Federal prisons. I have a feeling within the next 2 years they are going to need them for these rat bastards.
I can tell you with certainty that there was a concentrated effort by public officials and media members to commit fraud.
We’ve seen it regarding the COLB and the illegal hiding of the public records (including administrative rules) which would have prevented the fraud before America elected an ineligible president. The COLB was Obama’s first “tower” of manufactured evidence; its fraudulence has been documented.
His other “tower” of evidence was the birth announcements. That will soon fall as well, and the deception and fraud by people we were all told we should trust will be apparent.
My birth announcement was given to papers around the country by my grandparents. I can see that the announcement in The Sunday Advertiser has the section heading, “Health Bureau Statistics” which also includes marriage applications, but the Star Bulletin doesn’t, so we don’t know who gave the info. It very well have come from the Health Dept. but that does NOT mean that typical white granny didn’t give the birth info to the Health Dept. rather than the hospital. Bottom line, the newspaper only matters if it’s a proven lie.
It’s been said (rumored, and we don’t like rumors) that both papers got the info from the Health Dept. and that’s why everything is the same. Also said was the two were owned by the same people, which I doubt because there’s far too many differences in the layouts. Yes, these announcements were placed as space allowed but what’s odd is the “Sunday” (I’m assuming it was a weekly?) ended their birth list three down from Hussein at Wong, but the Star (no clue how often it was published), while starting with the same birth went on past Wong. There was at least a Kim baby below Wong but the online copy is cut off at that point so we don’t know how many announcements were in that edition. It just strikes me as strange that both began with the same person but ended with a different person. That would mean that the next edition would be starting with different babies and most likely every edition after that would also start different. Maybe I’m anal but why did this particular edition begin the same and why was it cut off to post in the internet just a fraction of an inch at the same place?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/obama-1961-birth-announcement-from-honolulu-advertiser0000.gif
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/ObamaBirthStarBulletin.jpg
