Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

You’re taking TD’s word for it
I don’t doubt the announcement exists on microfilm or microfiche. However, a couple of actual newspapers from the same date as the microfilm, papers that have been authenticated by more than one expert and that DO not show the O announcement but instead show something else, would be pretty damning, no? ;)


105 posted on 04/09/2010 4:33:06 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: mojitojoe

There are no paper copies anywhere, unless somebody saved it in their personal memorabilia.

But that doesn’t mean there’s no evidence of foul play.


106 posted on 04/09/2010 4:36:17 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: mojitojoe

I’m not taking anyone’s word for anything, I only posted what was written on Atlas Shrugs and TexasDarlin at the time.

It’s simply for the record.

There appears to be some misunderstanding of how birth announcements appeared in 1961. The myth is, they were generated by information from Vital Records.

I, and several other freepers have often suggested that birth announcements are the result of personal. i.e., insertions made and paid for by relatives.


111 posted on 04/09/2010 4:47:58 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson