They have the GPS location of our homes from the Census field work last summer and fall.
They know where to find any of us if we might become politically active in opposition.
The bastards are fascists of the first water.
Posted on 04/07/2010 7:24:39 AM PDT by kristinn
Maybe he thinks it his own version of marque and reprisal.
What did Obama do to lose Salon’s grace? I mean, he’s done a lot of things, it would be interesting to see exactly what set the SF’s lefties’ heads ringing.
Rush was talking about this issue shortly after 1pm.
It’s not the sand where their heads are firmly planted
They have the GPS location of our homes from the Census field work last summer and fall.
They know where to find any of us if we might become politically active in opposition.
The bastards are fascists of the first water.
Maybe it’s a trial balloon?
DU’s earlier response is reported to have been dead silence. I dunno if things have gotten yakkier since.
Like others, I couldn’t help but check DU. Personally I don’t care if islamics are killed even if citizens. I thought that way under Bush and now hussein.
It’s hilarious watching a majority over on DU going the whole ‘it’s ok when WE do it’ dance. They can’t help it. That kind of wingnut drives me insane. They have no principles, it’s all about us vs them to those types.
Suddenly war and privacy, 2 of the biggest things they complained about for 8 years are suddenly fine to them when it’s democrats that they insanely “trust” are in charge. Those types are mental children that should not be allowed to vote.
C’mon, don’t be like those that I talked about in my previous post. Had Bush had Adam Gadahn killed would you be complaining? I doubt it. These ‘citizens’ are traitors and deserve to be killed.
Of course, the main problem is to limit it to only islamic terrorists. IF that can be done, I have no problem whatsoever with taking them out when we can.
Dude, work on your consistency of position.
The point is our traitors get a trial to establish the condition.
Please define “enemy combatant.” I can think of at least one hundred reasons offhand why posters to this website might be considered such by this administration at some point
It’s consistent. I didn’t care about the islamics under Bush or under hussein. Screw em.
Obama’s acting like a Third World dictator. Uh, did anybody think to check whether he was from the Third World?
Have you been watching the news out of Michigan, Caesar? Right wing terrorists running amuck. How long before the next one and how long before we are all lumped into "right wing" and ergo "terrorist." Are you sure you want this guy permitting the assassination of "American terrorists" when the term terrorist is so open to redefinition? Remember Napolitano's report from last year on pro-life and 2nd Amendment bumper stickers? Sure it was retracted, but the skids have been greased.
0kaka is destroying this country and that is TERRORISM, pure and simple!
Assuming that Bin Laden was given free reign in the US, he couldn't have done this to us in such a short time.
It takes a dedicated army of communists headed and financed, beginning by Soros to grab power then by our tax dollars to march on, whether we like it or not.
___________
His wife knows it .......
(http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100407032734AAXom0z)
How about Slate's grace?
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:h48mGzvCGaIJ:www.slate.com/discuss/forums/thread/3795213.aspx+Never+Attended+any+of+the+Faculty+Meetings,+obama&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
I think this is the whole point. Obama and his ilk are so power drunk and so insane that they have come up with this to “set the precedent”. The precedent for declaring anyone who disagrees with him a terrorist or enemy of the state and order his/her assassination. The man and ALL of those surrounding him need to be removed poste haste and with full force. I feel like the American people have become so steamrolled that they are totally in a stunned state. This is unbelieveable. CO
>>...and advocates attacks on American military targets (advocacy which happens to be Constitutionally protected)...
>
>Sedition is Constitutionally protected?
Sedition is inciting a rebellion; which is distinct from advocating action against military targets, especially if those targets are engaged in what is believed to be invalid [military] actions.
I.E. It is not sedition for someone to say “we need to fight back!” against military personnel if, say, those military personnel were looting and/or raping the people of that community.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.