That puts it better than I would have.
Often when you ask someone WHEN does the “fetus” become a human deserving the protection of the state,
you’ll get a “I don’t know”. This was 0bama’s answer - “above my pay grade”.
Well, then - if we “don’t know”, or more accurately, don’t want to admit where the logic would take us,
should we err on the side of KILLING A HUMAN BEING?
If I was hunting with a buddy and didn’t know where he was and saw some movement in the brush ahead and “didn’t know” if it was a deer or my hunting buddy, should I just “err on the side of convenience” and shoot at the movement in case it’s a deer?