Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats: Convicted Felons Should Vote
Youth for Western Civilization ^ | Wednesday, 31 March 2010 | John Anderson

Posted on 04/04/2010 11:37:47 PM PDT by ConservativeJen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: ConservativeJen

Umm, this sort of thing used to be taken care of by a constitutional Amendment. Otherwise, the Feds don’t have that power.

Oh, wait, who pays attention to that silly old thing these days???


21 posted on 04/05/2010 2:12:38 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I am Ellie Light. I hate slow drivers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Time for all of us to contact our representatives again, I suppose.

Yeah, I'm sure the Democrats and their RINO fellow travelers will really listen to us peons...

22 posted on 04/05/2010 2:14:13 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I am Ellie Light. I hate slow drivers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

So when convicted felons have served their sentence they will be able to defend themselves with a gun too, right?


23 posted on 04/05/2010 2:16:09 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

From the article: “The left wing groups ‘Human Rights Watch’ and ‘The Sentencing Project’ argue that since black men are more likely to commit felonies, laws that disenfranchise felons have a very disproportionate racial effect.”

These groups say that committing felonies is caused by race? Where is the outrage by, for example, the Black Congressional Caucus, or the NAACP. I am a white guy, but I feel confident that there is nothing inherent in one’s race that causes one to commit crime. Do these groups not even think a little about what they are saying?


24 posted on 04/05/2010 2:24:31 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

If you still needed evidence of the FACT that communist democrats are working to destroy this country, then this ought to settle it for you.

A felon can cancel my vote?! My wife’s vote?!

I would ask if they are trying to start a civil war, but I know that any chaos will do for these rotten bastards!

Disgusting, un-American, anti-American, treasonous communists!

Domestic enemies—as good as they get.


25 posted on 04/05/2010 2:35:35 AM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

If you still needed evidence of the FACT that communist democrats are working to destroy this country, then this ought to settle it for you.

A felon can cancel my vote?! My wife’s vote?!

I would ask if they are trying to start a civil war, but I know that any chaos will do for these rotten bastards!

Disgusting, un-American, anti-American, treasonous communists!

Domestic enemies—as good as they get.


26 posted on 04/05/2010 2:35:44 AM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

“Dems need felons to vote for them now “

That’s because the majority of the Dumb’s are themselves
felons. Amen.


27 posted on 04/05/2010 2:36:58 AM PDT by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

I’ll make ‘em a bargain: Lose the Gun Control Act of 1968, and we can talk about felons voting.


28 posted on 04/05/2010 2:38:38 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nolongerademocrat
I reckon if they can accept dead people as legitimate voters, why wouldn't we be surprised they have no problems with felons?

It must be something to vote as a democrat today.

29 posted on 04/05/2010 3:16:31 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Where Liberty dwells, there is my Country. - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

Yes. The plan is to win with the votes of illegals and felons. Nice system, huh?


30 posted on 04/05/2010 3:37:06 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

We need to entirely rebrand them.


31 posted on 04/05/2010 3:46:29 AM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

Wonder if they’ll also demand that they restore their second amendment rights as well? Brazen isn’t the word. These rats could care less what America thinks. They’re concerned with but two things: power and control, by any means necessary.


32 posted on 04/05/2010 3:59:26 AM PDT by RU88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer
In most states there's already a process in place to restore your rights.

What the comieRATS are trying to pull off here is different. We'd have Voting Booths in every State & Fed Prison.

I don't mention County Jails as most 'inmates' there are awaiting trial and haven't been convicted of anything, 'yet'. Except for places like the Cook County Jail and out in LA or Rikers in NYC. (Its a mathematical given those people aren't newbies to Felony crime.)

33 posted on 04/05/2010 4:06:46 AM PDT by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder

Alcee Hastings was impeached and removed for crimes committed while a federal judge, but he was acquitted in his criminal trial. So, technically, he’s not a felon, and was able to vote for himself for Congress.


34 posted on 04/05/2010 4:26:06 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

the unconvicted felons are already voting...in Congress


35 posted on 04/05/2010 4:28:31 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

‘Felony’ is just too arbitrary a term today to justify taking away someone’s rights. In places like New York and Chicago, the term ‘felony self-defense’ isn’t much of an exaggeration.


36 posted on 04/05/2010 5:14:00 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen
The proposed law, H.R. 3335, prevents states from barring felons from voting by mandating that “The right of an individual who is a citizen of the United States to vote in any election for Federal office shall not be denied or abridged because that individual has been convicted of a criminal offense unless such individual is serving a felony sentence in a correctional institution or facility at the time of the election.

Stick an amendment on that bill stating that their second amendment rights to own firearms are also fully restored.

37 posted on 04/05/2010 6:02:14 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Give them 2.54 cm and they'll take 1.61 km.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeJen

Felons = the Democrat Party BASE


38 posted on 04/05/2010 6:03:59 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer

I have to agree with you on this, If a person is trusted to return to society from prison, then ALL his rights should be restored. And I’m not a convicted felon.
Democrats could be fooled, (they aren’t very bright,usually)as there is no guarantee that said felons will vote dem.If a convict is released into society,and gets a job, and starts becoming a responsible citizen and sees his paycheck being heisted to fund entitlements that are totally irrevelant to his well-being, and becomes familiar with the issues, he may just vote conservative.
My opinions?
1. If people are released into society, restore thier rights. If it is felt that you can’t, then quite obviously, they haven’t been locked up long enough.
2.Stop most background checks. Background checks should be reserved only for certain jobs. If a person who is released from prison can’t go to work, his chances are FAR greater of repeat offence.I work in the oilfield in Texas, and I see background checks used that disqualify otherwise perfectly suitable employees in jobs that the check is really pretty irrelevant.
3.Restore firearm rights. All the gun laws have ever done is make stupid people feel good about themselves. Anyone walking the streets as a free person should be able to own personal firearms. There is no evidence to convince me that a person who wanted to commit a crime couldn’t get a weapon due to gun laws. If I was a convict, and I wanted a firearm, I could probably have one in ten minutes, provided I had money. Nation Instant Check is more BS to increase govt. and provide non-productive govt.jobs to suck up taxpayers money.
4. Child molesters are an exception. I am not sure they can ever be totally trusted in society, so trying to keep tabs on their whereabouts might be a good idea. Or maybe never release them?
5 IMHO.


39 posted on 04/05/2010 6:06:03 AM PDT by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Mamas don't let your cowboys grow up to be babies..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Abundy

People just like us sit on the juries to decide how long that sentence should be, and after it is served and that person is released, the answer to that question is Yes.


40 posted on 04/05/2010 6:12:50 AM PDT by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Mamas don't let your cowboys grow up to be babies..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson