Posted on 04/01/2010 12:35:40 PM PDT by topher
Thursday April 1, 2010Forgotten Study: Abuse in School 100 Times Worse than by Priests
By James Tillman and John Jalsevac WASHINGTON, DC, April 1, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) In the last several weeks such a quantity of ink has been spilled in newspapers across the globe about the priestly sex abuse scandals, that a casual reader might be forgiven for thinking that Catholic priests are the worst and most common perpetrators of child sex abuse. But according to Charol Shakeshaft, the researcher of a little-remembered 2004 study prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, "the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests." After effectively disappearing from the radar, Shakeshafts study is now being revisited by commentators seeking to restore a sense of proportion to the mainstream coverage of the Church scandal. According to the 2004 study the most accurate data available at this time indicates that nearly 9.6 percent of students are targets of educator sexual misconduct sometime during their school career. Educator sexual misconduct is woefully under-studied, writes the researcher. We have scant data on incidence and even less on descriptions of predators and targets. There are many questions that call for answers. In an article published on Monday, renowned Catholic commentator George Weigel referred to the Shakeshaft study, and observed that The sexual and physical abuse of children and young people is a global plague in which Catholic priests constitute only a small minority of perpetrators. While Weigel observes that the findings of Shakeshafts study do nothing to mitigate the harm caused by priestly abuse, or excuse the clericalism and fideism that led bishops to ignore the problem, they do point to a gross imbalance in the level of scrutiny given to it, throwing suspicion on the motives of the news outlets that are pouring their resources into digging up decades-old dirt on the Church. The narrative that has been constructed is often less about the protection of the young (for whom the Catholic Church is, by empirical measure, the safest environment for young people in America today) than it is about taking the Church down," he writes. Weigel observes that priestly sex abuse is a phenomenon that spiked between the mid-1960s and the mid-1980s but seems to have virtually disappeared, and that in recent years the Church has gone to great lengths to punish and remove priestly predators and to protect children. The result of these measures is that six credible cases of clerical sexual abuse in 2009 were reported in the U.S. bishops annual audit, in a Church of some 65,000,000 members. Despite these facts, however, the sexual abuse story in the global media is almost entirely a Catholic story, in which the Catholic Church is portrayed as the epicenter of the sexual abuse of the young. Outside of the Church, Shakeshaft is not alone in highlighting the largely unaddressed, and unpublicized problem of child sex abuse in schools. Sherryll Kraizer, executive director of the Denver-based Safe Child Program, told the Colorado Gazette in 2008 that school employees commonly ignore laws meant to prevent the sexual abuse of children. I see it regularly, Kraizer said. There are laws against failing to report, but the law is almost never enforced. Almost never. What typically happens is youll have a teacher whos spending a little too much time in a room with one child with the door shut, Kraizer explained. Another teacher sees it and reports it to the principal. The principal calls the suspected teacher in and says Dont do that, instead of contacting child protective services. Before you know it, the teacher is driving the student home. A whole series of events will unfold, known to other teachers and the principal, and nobody contacts child services before its out of control. You see this documented in records after it eventually ends up in court. In an editorial last week, The Gazette revisited the testimony of Kraizer in the context of the Church abuse scandal coverage, concluding that the much larger crisis remains in our public schools today, where children are raped and groped every day in the United States. The media and others must maintain their watchful eye on the Catholic Church and other religious institutions, wrote The Gazette, But its no less tragic when a child gets abused at school. In 2004, shortly after the Shakeshaft study was released, Catholic League President William Donohue, who was unavailable for an interview for this story, asked, Where is the media in all this? Isnt it news that the number of public school students who have been abused by a school employee is more than 100 times greater than the number of minors who have been abused by priests? he asked. All those reporters, columnists, talking heads, attorneys general, D.A.s, psychologists and victims groups who were so quick on the draw to get priests have a moral obligation to pursue this issue to the max. If they dont, theyre a fraud. |
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.
The double standard sickens me.
Im shocked the ratio is that close. It’s one thing for bureaucrats to abuse people, even children. It is far more shocking and disturbing when the clergy does it.
I would think the ratio would be 1000/1 or greater.
If not, I don't know whay you said it.
And if so, you're the only one I know of in this forum who holds that opinion.
And you’re biased.
“One would hope that members of the Body of Christ would do better than they have ... certainly at least as well as public schools at discipling those that are caught. Shuffling people around is not good enough. Excommunication and firing are a minimum.”
The repetition of complaints about the church NOW are REPETTIVE... as the writer in this article points out the NEW facts are
“Weigel observes that priestly sex abuse is a phenomenon that spiked between the mid-1960s and the mid-1980s but seems to have virtually disappeared, and that in recent years the Church has gone to great lengths to punish and remove priestly predators and to protect children. The result of these measures is that six credible cases of clerical sexual abuse in 2009 were reported in the U.S. bishops annual audit, in a Church of some 65,000,000 members.
Yet your posts act like this is still an ongoing problem as it was decades ago. THAT is posting the same Mantra over and over...and that then becomes catholic “bashing’ because it serves no helpful purpose EXCEPT to reiterate the failures of the church in the past...to act like you are JUST saying that priests should not abuese children is disingenuous at best.
Your comment” the hierarchy does have some things to answer for”...Well, they have for the last 4 decades. But that is not good enough...lets just rehash the history prior to the the changes the church has made and call it your “wanting quicker action”
the facts, you ask?...read the article for “the facts” that you blythely ignore about the changes made and the issue actively and effectively addressed.
as for comparing the Catholic church problems to the schools or other churches, organizations...That is NOT dimishing bad behavior. it is a response to the ONLY FOCUSING on the Catholic church...And that IS what you do..when you refer to excommunication and also focus on the Church’s problems, while never mentioning that this is a vast problem.
I sure haven’t seen you post anything of such outrage about anyone else. You just ‘join the NY Times party” when they release another article complaining about the church.
I would have more respect for someone who is at least honest in your vitriole and not demur about “Well, i’m not asking the Pope to resign....”
I will expect you at the next thread that attempts to defend the changes the Catholic church has made...of course, those don’t count.
No, they just put them on indefinite paid leave while they “investigate” the claim so the union member is able to have a nice long paid vacation.
>> That is NOT dimishing bad behavior. it is a response to the ONLY FOCUSING on the Catholic church...And that IS what you do..when you refer to excommunication and also focus on the Churchs problems, while never mentioning that this is a vast problem. I sure havent seen you post anything of such outrage about anyone else. You just join the NY Times party when they release another article complaining about the church.
Should I not have greater outrage for abuse carried out by in the name of Christ than I do for abuse by your average scumbag? A child abuser harms a child. A child abuser involved with the church harms a child, and tarnishes the name of Christ and His followers. When combined with the criminality, the heresy of the latter is certainly a greater problem than just the criminality of the former. Greater outrage is warranted.
>> I will expect you at the next thread that attempts to defend the changes the Catholic church has made...of course, those dont count.
On the contrary, earlier today, in a different thread, I spoke in favor of the pope’s plans to excommunicate abusers.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2484745/posts?page=20#20
I can give credit when due, as well as criticism when due.
SnakeDoc
yeah against the molestation of minors no matter who commits the crime
EXCEEDINGLY SOBERING.
Dreadful.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
The author of this article on abuse was named Shakeshaft, and today is April 1st. Coincidence?
I read the post you referred to. it was a fair post.
I appreciate your giving credit where credit is due and responding to my post in a debate form.
thank you.
I will continue to read your posts and responses.
No one is saying they do. That's not the point of the article. Read the first sentence again.
“When it happens at school they either are fired and or go to jail.”
Around here, the male teachers usually don’t “get caught” until they get caught with kiddie pr0n, then it all comes out. The few that get caught touching kids are caught when a victim goes to authorities and it makes the papers. Frequently the record of the caught teacher shows several transfers from school to school or district to district.
The public schools in the United States are the equivalent of the Church of England in the United States. Even the nonconformist must support it with his taxes.
What definition of “physical sexual abuse” was used in the study”
So the number of Catholics in America is about 65,000,000?
There are those who said that John Kerry "pretended" to be "Catholic" and was "secretly" Jewish to court both of these groups in the 2004 election.
There are about 1 billion Catholics worldwide. Countries like the Philippines, Latin America, etc. swell the number of Catholics worldwide.
The other Christian groups (Baptists, Methodists, Anglicans, etc) keep splintering. I believe there are about 60,000 different "other Christian denominations" in the US.
Admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.