If you ever done any kind of manual record keeping and handling, you'll know that things do not tend to happen and stay in proper sequential order.
On other threads hypothetical situations have been postulated (that is all we can do) as to how this discrepancy could happen through number block assignments, LIFO processes (Last In, First Out - basically the in-box fills from the bottom up, but it processed from the top down) or other means.
As for the facts you've listed, let's pick one: The SSN’s. Someone ran a superficial check on names that were similar to B. Obama. From that, with -zero- follow up or investigation it was declared that BHO had been using all of those SSN’s. Do you have a different view of this?
That would sound good if these had been processed on the same day. The dates of publication of the birth announcements gives us an indication that processing for the certificates was finished three days apart. Each batch consisted of 25 or more births, so it's next to impossible that one record in the middle of a batch would have a higher number than births that didn't get processed until three days later. That they would only be three numbers apart ... even less possible.
I didn’t give any facts on my blog about SS#’s. Let’s stick with the one I did mention: the certificate numbers.
Obama’s supposed COLB was given a number 3 days before the Nordykes’ were given numbers (which is absurd if they were born at the same hospital, since the hospital delivered all their BC’s to the state registrar’s office on the same day; since Obama was born on a Friday evening he missed that week’s BC delivery and should have been in the same batch as the Nordykes the following Friday). Yet his BC supposedly has a number later than theirs. What theory would explain that?
Seems to me that Obama’s people botched up because they thought that hospital BC’s trickled in one by one. But they didn’t. Even the administrative rules say that’s not how they were to be done.