Just more evidence you don't even understand the definition of "constitutional law", nor do you have the capacity to understand Supreme Court decisions.
Is that the same "constitutional law" that was consulted for the Senate's SR511???
or that defined the qualifications that every President in our history has met except the one who appointed your beloved Gray to the Court, leaving his papers in ashes to hide his shortcomings.
Oh, I'm sorry, you said "definition". Is that the 19th century "definition" before 1998??? or that definition that keeps changing every year from law school to law school??? or your new and improved definition???
nor do you have the capacity to understand Supreme Court decisions.
No -- that seems to be your problem, not mine. You're the one who doesn't understand the Wong Kim Ark "decision", because nowhere in that case was he ever declared to be a "natural born citizen".
But please keep searching for more evidence and reading those Supreme Court decisions. You might actually come across those half dozen or more Supreme Court cases in which the phrase "natural born citizen" is defined for you.