Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: David
by state action to lay the groundwork for ballot challenge in the event of a 2012 reelection campaign.

This is my interest in the issue: regardless of Obambi's eligibility, this whole question has demonstrated that there is no adequate procedure to vouchsafe the Constitution's requirement that a president be a natural born citizen.

Going on some schlub at Party HQ saying, "Yep, he's eligible," doesn't cut it. Has Congress ever even set out what it thinks makes a person eligible for POTUS under the Constitution? No. So how in the world is there even a reviewable standard that is applied by schlub down at Party HQ when putting names on the ballot?

To prevent this garbage in the future, it simply seems prudent for Congress and/or the States to enact procedures for reviewing eligibility, including a standard, a process for appeal and a remedy.

18 posted on 04/01/2010 10:21:01 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Forced public transportation:because it's not "affordable" unless we all have to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG
"by state action to lay the groundwork for ballot challenge in the event of a 2012 reelection campaign."

This is my interest in the issue: regardless of Obambi's eligibility, this whole question has demonstrated that there is no adequate procedure to vouchsafe the Constitution's requirement that a president be a natural born citizen.

The problem with the existing procedures is that they don't leave you with any clear procedural path on which to proceed to challenge the finding. If not before, it should have been available to challenge Cheney's signature on the certificate that Obama was elected. But you can't see how to get that into court.

In process at the moment is an effort to enact statutes at the state level requiring the chief election officer of the state (usually the Secretary of State) to confirm eligibility before putting the candidate on the ballot.

The problem with Dorifrio's proceeding on the parentage historical citizenship issues from Vitell is that those arguments don't have any legal merit. And if you lose a case on the basis of that argument, it will then been argued to a Secretary of State who seeks to disqualify Obama on a reelection effort as a bar to disqualification.

People need to recognize that Obama has very capable lawyers who are strategizing how to avoid the successful ballot challenge who see this as the way to success.

25 posted on 04/01/2010 10:39:37 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
-- Has Congress ever even set out what it thinks makes a person eligible for POTUS under the Constitution? --

The Senate adopted a resolution covering McCain. Naturally, that resolution put LOTS of weight on the fact that both his parents were citizens, and NO weight on the location of his birth.

32 posted on 04/01/2010 11:00:36 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Good point. And government, the media, and law enforcement have totally abdicated their responsibilities regarding Obama’s criminal activity. See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/


95 posted on 04/01/2010 6:48:15 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson