I see. Get back to you when I’ve published something in the East Anglia, peer-reviewed, totally honest scholarly journal.
Do you trust NBA scores if they’re not analyzed in peer-reviewed scientific journals?
Heaven forbid that YOU would go to the work of peer-reviewing something put out by the unwashed masses rather than the educational elite.
I thought better of you than that.
Good grief, you don't even understand how a law review works, and you're criticizing it.
A law review is a scholarly/academic journal where people of varying legal philosophies posit their researched opinion and scholarly theory for others to read. It's the reading - by the at-large legal community - that serves as the "peer review".
Birthers can't even get a single lawyer of any repute to put his/her name on their theories. Why is that?