Are you really comparing believing a live event seen by tens of thousands and broadcast around the world with believing that BHO amended his vital records because Hawaii didn't tell you specifically that there's not a receipt for him having done so?
You're going to figure this out in your own time.
My larger concern is that you may make choices based on your presumptions that could be detrimental to you. Like when you posted some time back that you were considering not paying your taxes over this. But, perhaps I misunderstood.
Nevertheless you seem sincere in your investigation. And I'd rather decent folks not make bad choices based on false information.
Speaking of being silly, did you not see that the state of Hawaii tried to shut down what they called ‘vexatious requesters’ not long after B published her red flags investigation?? These people are feeling the heat and were willing to squash first amendment rights because of their own refusal to honestly deal with the birth records of one person. Think a little bit instead of trying to belittle.
Hawaii’s DOH specifically told Terri that she was denied access to the records. Two different people from the OIP specifically told Terri that she was denied access to the records.
This isn’t a matter of what the DOH didn’t say. It’s a matter of what they DID say. They said Terri wasn’t allowed to see those records.
Deal with it. They said it, several times, when their answer was being contested and put under a microscope.
It just seems to me that you’re saying that even when somebody knows the consequences are high, when they’re asked repeated times, when it is clear that the question is critical.... you’re asking me to believe that it was just an oops that they repeatedly gave the same answer - and it was just an oops that the people who are appointed to correct errors just happened multiple times to agree with the consistently-given answers even as the significance of the issue was impressed upon them.
You’re either being incredibly naive or incredibly disingenuous.
Sure, everybody saw the Twin Towers event - just like lots of people have seen the e-mails the DOH sent out. But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t just an “oops” that the plane just accidentally strayed off course a little bit.
If a plane strays off course as an oops it will be steered back on track. Terri gave the DOH and OIP multiple opportunities to steer the plane back on track if what they said was actually an oops. They wouldn’t.
It was no accident of omission. It was a positive statement made multiple times after being asked to clarify several times - and having been checked for accuracy by the watchdog group several times.
If that’s not good enough evidence for you then nothing I could come up with would be good enough for you and dialog with you is a waste of my time.