Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brownsfan
In grad school back in the 70s I had a brilliant Jesuit prof at Fordham raise the danger of the language in the seditious conspiracy law. It could include anyone from anti war protesters to organized crime and anything in between. The phrase "oppose the authority of the govt of the U.S." is a catchall.

I do not believe the law has been used in my lifetime.It was not used against the Chicago 8, the Berrigan brothers, Code Pink,the Gambino crime family, or any group I know of. It has never been used in the jihadi prosecutions, like the 5 from Buffalo or the recently planned subway bombings by US citizens. To be used now, in this case may be a warning. Today a militia group (not exactly a popular group). Tomorrow the Tea Party itself.

215 posted on 03/29/2010 8:58:02 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Never compromise with evil! Even in the face of Armageddon!! Rorshach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: xkaydet65
It's like "obscenity" laws. "I know it when I see it..."

In any sane legal system, it has no place.

A real crime involves 3 distinct things.

  1. A Perp
  2. A Victim
  3. Actual Damage Done
Anything else is setting up a system whereby you can be jailed for hurting yourself, mopary, or where the only "victim" is a piece of paper with words written on it.
238 posted on 03/29/2010 9:13:11 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson