The truth comes out with you. It is all about electability. That is okay; see how well Romneycare plays with all the Americans fighting Obamacare.
The idea that we now (almost two years before the first primary) have to choose between Palin and Romney, that anyone who opposes the first endorses the second, is, frankly, nuts.
You must be a liberal...or at least you argue like one. No, it's not all about electability. But given the choice between a constitutional candidate that can win, and one that can't I think the choice is obvious. So what you're doing is presenting a false dichotomy. You're implying that Palin is the only viable candidate and electability has no effect. Both those assumptions are false.
Additionally, I fail to see the point of your Romneycare reference unless you're suffering from some delusion that thinks I'd see Romney as a viable candidate. I have stated that if the republicans run Romney vs Obama I will either vote 3 party or not vote at all. I will not vote for the lesser of two evils any longer. I voted for McCain out of support for Palin, but I saw the choice between McCain and Obama as the choice between Dumb and Dumber.