You must be a liberal...or at least you argue like one. No, it's not all about electability. But given the choice between a constitutional candidate that can win, and one that can't I think the choice is obvious. So what you're doing is presenting a false dichotomy. You're implying that Palin is the only viable candidate and electability has no effect. Both those assumptions are false.
Additionally, I fail to see the point of your Romneycare reference unless you're suffering from some delusion that thinks I'd see Romney as a viable candidate. I have stated that if the republicans run Romney vs Obama I will either vote 3 party or not vote at all. I will not vote for the lesser of two evils any longer. I voted for McCain out of support for Palin, but I saw the choice between McCain and Obama as the choice between Dumb and Dumber.
How has this discussion degraded to Loyd and Floyd Mayweather J.R.? All I caon say is that I have not proposed a false dichotomy, bychotomy, or lobotomy. The D.J. Hayworth issue is under the bridge.