Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/26/2010 10:53:59 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cindy

Ping


2 posted on 03/26/2010 10:55:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Remember when America had the balls that Israel does??

This Obama bastard is like the French...

there is nothing he won’t agree to from our enemies...

and nothing he won’t refuse from our allies!!


3 posted on 03/26/2010 11:09:48 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCbfMkh940Q
4 posted on 03/26/2010 11:11:22 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

“The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) says in a new report that “some believe that nuclear weapons are the only weapons that can destroy targets deep underground or in tunnels.”

“But other independent experts are on record warning that such a scenario is based on the “myth” of a clean atomic attack and would be too politically hazardous to justify.”

This is a case where both sides may be right. It may well take a nuclear weapon to get at some of Iran’s most deeply buried facilities. The U.S. (and others) have developed some pretty phenomenal conventional bunker busters, but there are likely a few places too deep for them.

On the other hand, “tactical” nuclear weapons are (and probably always have been) tactical only in the strictest military sense. The moment a nation uses one, the political fallout will likely be the same whether the yield was half a kiloton or 1 megaton.


7 posted on 03/26/2010 11:30:53 PM PDT by DemforBush (Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

More than most people want to know about this subject:

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11282&page=R1


8 posted on 03/26/2010 11:52:58 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Wishful thinking:

Iran hits Israel with a small nuke, but it’s a dud, and the cruise missile carrying it hits in Palestinian territory.

Then Israel strikes back with effective nukes on all Iran’s enrichment facilities.

The world shrugs because Israel didn’t strike first. Iranians rise up and rip Imanutjob and the Mullahs to pieces.


10 posted on 03/27/2010 1:26:49 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (Democrat: Someone who supports killing children, but protests executing convicted murderers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Obama was too hungry to discuss Israel’s intentions. The megalomaniac will start WW III with his childishness.


13 posted on 03/27/2010 4:18:06 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson