[Blue Turtle]

This is NOT in the bag for Obama.....keep calling and putting the pressure on. Let’s not have to repeal this thing....let’s kill the bill.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Who really thinks that Sanchez is going to vote no? I have a bridge for sale for anyone who buys that.

[bray]

The obama Curse is still in play.

Pray for America

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Where was the shift? I'm not seeing it. FDL still has the same #'s and Sanchez is a wh0re who will vote with the RATS?

Stupaks conf. is cancelled which means that Pel0ser is carving out his wishes still.

[Mengerian]

My prediction: We're going to get this unmercifully rammed down our throats today.

Stupak (et al.) will cave under the bogus EO promised by Obama.

We're screwed folks, this is as good as done.

[Logical me]

Remember those that vote yes, we must purge them from any government job for their entire life. We should remember that these yes voters are communists.

[EagleUSA]

These filthy Dims are going to pay big time in November, regardless of how this vote comes out. They are power-mad slime that do NOT CARE ABOUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THEIR WILL OR THEIR FREEDOMS and they will pay.

The American public knows WHO AND WHAT they are. The November vote will reflect that. They are starting a war they cannot finish.

[nhwingut]

One big charade.

The fight, imo, is over who GETS to vote NO. Not who WILL vote NO.

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

My hope is that the "undecideds" are hoping to hold out until it's apparent that the bill is going to pass, so they can then vote no.

But what if there aren't enough "yes" votes when their turn to vote comes? Will they vote "yes"?

God help us!

[voicereason]

Let’s see if darwinistic tendencies override the dem’s willingness to be led to the slaughter by voting yes on this bill.

[KansasGirl]

[Meanwhile, Virginia Rep. Rick Boucher, who had been a solid no until a few days ago, now says he’s “undecided.”]

Guess Pelosi may need his vote afterall.

[GailA]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2476086/posts

Boehner: “Pro-Life” Democrats Can’t Hide Behind an Executive Order

Rec’d via e-mail | Sunday, March 21, 2010 | John Boehner

Posted on Sunday, March 21, 2010 12:10:31 PM by kristinn

GOP Leader: “Make no mistake, a ‘yes’ vote on the Democrats’ health care bill is a vote for taxpayer-funded abortions.”

WASHINGTON, DC – House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) issued the following statement on a potential Executive Order from the White House on abortion:

“The law of the land trumps any Executive Order, which can be reversed or altered at the stroke of a pen by this or any subsequent President without any congressional approval or notice. Moreover, while an Executive Order can direct members of the executive branch, it cannot direct the private sector.

“Because of Roe v. Wade, courts have interpreted the decision as a statutory mandate that the government must provide federal funding for elective abortion in through federal programs. In other words, no Executive Order or regulation can override a statutory mandate unless Congress passes a law that prohibits federal funding from being used in this manner. Legal experts at the US Catholic Conference of Bishops, National Right to Life Committee, Americans United for Life, and Family Research Council have confirmed this view that if the Senate bill is signed into law, it is a statutory mandate for the new health plans to include federal funding of elective abortion. The need for an Executive Order is evidence that this is true, and Congressional Democrats know it. Make no mistake, a ‘yes’ vote on the Democrats’ health care bill is a vote for taxpayer-funded abortions.”