Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Executiive Order (on abortion)(sic)
NRO Online ^ | 03/21/10 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 03/21/2010 8:55:38 AM PDT by OldDeckHand

As of last night, this was the text. Not having a ton of Democratic sources, I can't tell you if this is the final or not, assuming there is even such a thing:

Proposed Executive Order Language

1. The Executive Order directs that the Hyde language found in sections 507 and 508 of the Labor HHH Appropriations Bill shall apply to the HR 3590.

SEC. 507.

(a) None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for any abortion.

(b) None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion.

(c) The term ‘‘health benefits coverage’’ means the package of services covered by a managed care provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement.

......


(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; healthcare; obamacare; stupak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Stupak says he'll have something to say later on, whatever that means.
1 posted on 03/21/2010 8:55:38 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Surreal.


2 posted on 03/21/2010 8:57:41 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Lance Corporal texted me at 0330 on 2/3/10: AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

BS. The lib Dems would bolt if abortion is not covered. It does not matter cause they will just attach another bill or exec order.

Stupak and his gang are supposedly pro-lifers and they are dealing with evil. Making deals with evil is still evil.


3 posted on 03/21/2010 8:57:48 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

If Stupak thinks that EO is worth anything more than the paper it is written on, then he is dumber than a box of rocks. Pelosi and Obama are in “whatever it takes” mode and will make an empty promise to get a vote in a NY minute.


4 posted on 03/21/2010 8:59:46 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Evidently, according to NRO, what’s left of the Stupak Group have canceled their noon presser. Think they finally understood that an Executive Order seeking what they want is the equivalent Monopoly Money?


5 posted on 03/21/2010 9:00:05 AM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
4. Under this Act, the Accommodation of Conscious is recognized.

Conscious?

6 posted on 03/21/2010 9:00:21 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Lance Corporal texted me at 0330 on 2/3/10: AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

What the PRESidENT giveth, the PRESidENT can take away.

An executive order can be rescinded at any time, at a moment’s notice, by any President.


7 posted on 03/21/2010 9:00:52 AM PDT by Redbob (Pray for Pres.Osamabama: Psalm 109;v.7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Exactly!


8 posted on 03/21/2010 9:02:23 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

So the One signs (2) EOs? One pro-abortion and the other pro-life? Where does the spinning head stop? This has REALLY become a circus.


9 posted on 03/21/2010 9:02:29 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

So they can lie to him about the abortion thing and fix it later. How can the govt deny coverage for any medical procedure that opne party has enshrined as a Constitutional “right”

He and the other “moderate dmeocrats” have no problem with the TWO TRILLION cost (an underestimate) and loss of individual liberty and slow descent into bureaucratic control over citizen’s most private lives

This is the problem with pinning your hopes on a one-trick pony


10 posted on 03/21/2010 9:02:47 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Congress is America's only native criminal class."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Here's the caveat...

"(c) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as restricting the ability of any managed care provider from offering abortion coverage or the ability of a State or locality to contract separately with such a provider for such coverage with State funds (other than a State’s or locality’s contribution of Medicaid matching funds.)"

IOW, if we - the government - give you - the insured - a subsidy to pay for your private health insurance (which is going to be millions, perhaps tens of millions of people), we don't care if that private health insurance pays for abortions on demand, we will gladly continue to force the US taxpayer to pay your health insurance premium.

11 posted on 03/21/2010 9:02:49 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antonico
Evidently, according to NRO, what’s left of the Stupak Group have canceled their noon presser. Think they finally understood that an Executive Order seeking what they want is the equivalent Monopoly Money?

Link?

12 posted on 03/21/2010 9:04:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: don-o

4. Under this Act, the Accommodation of Conscious is recognized.

A simple spelling mistake, they meant...

4. Under this Act, the Accommodation of Couscous is recognized.


13 posted on 03/21/2010 9:05:00 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: don-o
"Conscious?

Beats me. I've practiced law for 25 years and have never seen nor heard the phrase, "Accommodation of Conscious".

14 posted on 03/21/2010 9:06:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"Link? "

If you go to the link for this story, and then click on the "the Corner" section and scroll down just a little bit, you'll see that particular post that talks about the presser, FWIW.

15 posted on 03/21/2010 9:07:40 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; SE Mom; onyx; Miss Didi

Ping to the EO.


16 posted on 03/21/2010 9:08:06 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Worse than surreal.

It’s unconscionable.

Why can’t the language be put into the reconciliation legislation?


17 posted on 03/21/2010 9:09:59 AM PDT by onyx (God save our Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antonico
They would loss 40 votes if Obama made that executive order. I saved my McCain Palin sign and it goes into the yard on every big criminal vote of the Democrats. I just put it in my yard for today!
18 posted on 03/21/2010 9:11:18 AM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

I am thoroughly livid.

The Marxist has abused the highest office in our land to garner the vote of stupid Stupak.

God Damn them all.


19 posted on 03/21/2010 9:11:38 AM PDT by onyx (God save our Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Promises Promises. STUPAK will be STUPID if he believes the perpetual LIES.


20 posted on 03/21/2010 9:11:45 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer (Don't tread on us...or you'll pay the price in the next election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson