Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: chessplayer; metmom
2 posted on
03/19/2010 4:59:52 PM PDT by
celmak
To: chessplayer
“You shall not prostrate yourself to them nor worship them, for I am Hashem, your G-d - a jealous G-d, Who visits the sin of the fathers upon children to the third and fourth generations, for My enemies”
- Exodus, 20:5
3 posted on
03/19/2010 5:09:59 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Call the local offices of Congresscritters. They are still answering the phone.)
To: chessplayer; metmom
Yet epigenetics suggests this isn't the whole story. If what happens to you during your lifetime living in a stress-inducing henhouse, say, or overeating in northern Sweden can affect how your genes express themselves in future generations, the absolutely simple version of natural selection begins to look questionable." Hmmm...
4 posted on
03/19/2010 5:13:28 PM PDT by
celmak
To: chessplayer; SunkenCiv; Slings and Arrows
Will these twinkies make my daughter’s butt look big?
6 posted on
03/19/2010 5:20:19 PM PDT by
fanfan
(Why did they bury Barry's past?)
To: chessplayer
This is not new only ignored. There has been evidence for lamarkian processes in evolution for the past 20 years or more. Evolution has faced the same kind of leftist narrow often idiotic interpretation that we see coming out of environmental and social sciences. We live in generation where the information is everywhere and few comprehend the significance of anything.
11 posted on
03/19/2010 5:55:43 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(Confiscation of wealth with out explicit consent is not charity.)
To: chessplayer
Wow, that article was almost as long as a pre-trib rapture piece.
12 posted on
03/19/2010 5:58:49 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: chessplayer
The Swedish chicken study was one of several recent breakthroughs in the youthful field of epigenetics, which primarily studies the epigenome, the protective package of proteins around which genetic material strands of DNA is wrapped. The epigenome plays a crucial role in determining which genes actually express themselves in a creature's traits: in effect, it switches certain genes on or off, or turns them up or down in intensity. It isn't news that the environment can alter the epigenome; what's news is that those changes can be inherited. And this doesn't, of course, apply only to chickens: some of the most striking findings come from research involving humans.This can explain why certain households in this country have generational problems even with the best intentions fail to correct.
Very interesting theory
13 posted on
03/19/2010 5:59:53 PM PDT by
Popman
(Balsa wood: Obama Presidential timber)
To: chessplayer
What if Darwin's theory of natural selection is inaccurate? What if evolution is a bunch of brain-dead BS....
To: chessplayer
It sounds like two scholars debating over a point in the Talmud. And about as useful.
25 posted on
03/19/2010 9:02:05 PM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: chessplayer
28 posted on
03/19/2010 10:16:35 PM PDT by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: chessplayer
37 posted on
03/20/2010 1:03:27 PM PDT by
ForGod'sSake
(You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
To: chessplayer
Its always a laugh to see someone that considers themself a scientist acting as though they really believe that evolution could have happened.
Or is it just the goofy writers?
46 posted on
03/20/2010 9:58:41 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
To: chessplayer
All things old are new again:
Not to mention...
To: chessplayer
The irony in all this is that Darwin himself never claimed that it was. He went to his deathbed protesting that he'd been misinterpreted: there was no reason, he said, to assume that natural selection was the only imaginable mechanism of evolution. Interesting post... thanks.
63 posted on
03/21/2010 3:28:43 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
To: chessplayer
From readying the article, I’ve come to the conclusion that the human brain cannot comprehend or fathom the process of natural selection far enough back as to understand the effects that alter future generations and why..
Damn that was hard to write!
143 posted on
03/23/2010 5:54:41 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
To: chessplayer
From reading the article, I’ve come to the conclusion that the human brain cannot comprehend or fathom the process of natural selection far enough back as to understand the effects that alter future generations and why..
Damn that was hard to write!
SEE!
145 posted on
03/23/2010 5:56:59 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
To: chessplayer
Creationists support Lamarckian inheritance now?
To: chessplayer
303 posted on
03/24/2010 6:24:09 PM PDT by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: chessplayer; texas booster
The Swedish chicken study was one of several recent breakthroughs in the youthful field of epigenetics, which primarily studies the epigenome, the protective package of proteins around which genetic material strands of DNA is wrapped. The epigenome plays a crucial role in determining which genes actually express themselves in a creature's traits: in effect, it switches certain genes on or off, or turns them up or down in intensity. It isn't news that the environment can alter the epigenome; what's news is that those changes can be inherited. And this doesn't, of course, apply only to chickens: some of the most striking findings come from research involving humans.
"Something else for the FR Folding gang to ruminate" PING.
321 posted on
03/24/2010 11:01:43 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! Â)
To: chessplayer
Darwin was the algorejr. of his generation, nothing more.
341 posted on
03/25/2010 7:13:31 PM PDT by
Waco
(Kalifonia don't need no stenkin oil and no stenkin revenue.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson