http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/briefing-white-house-press-secretary-robert-gibbs-32410
Home • Briefing Room • Press Briefings
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release March 24, 2010
“Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 3/24/10”
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
12:40 P.M. EDT
SNIPPET: “Q On Israel, I’d like to ask you briefly about the visit yesterday by Prime Minister Netanyahu. As you know, diplomacy involves not just the substance of the event, but how it’s handled. And in this case, there were really none of the normal trappings of a foreign visit, in terms of press coverage and even a readout. Can you explain a little bit about why the White House decided to handle it that way?
MR. GIBBS: Well, let me categorize — the President and the Prime Minister met, first off, the Oval, and had an honest and straightforward discussion about our relationship, about regional security and about comprehensive peace efforts. The President asked the Prime Minister to take steps to build confidence for proximity talks so that progress can be made towards comprehensive Middle East peace. There are areas of agreement, there are areas of disagreement, and that conversation is ongoing.
The Prime Minister arrived a little after 5:30 p.m. That meeting concluded a little after 7:00 p.m. last evening. The President went back to the residence. Prime Minister Netanyahu remained in the White House and consulted with his staff in the Roosevelt Room and then requested to see the President again, and they returned to the Oval Office at about 8:20 p.m. and met for a little more than half an hour.
Q On the substance, just one second on that — but back to my original question about the handling of this. Why did the White House decide to handle — that was so low profile.
MR. GIBBS: Well, we’ve handled different visits in different ways and this is the way we felt most comfortable handling this one.
Q Is there any concern about how it could be perceived — particularly by Jewish voters or Jewish donors — that this was a cold-shoulder kind of visit or there was anything less than a full extension?
MR. GIBBS: No, I — look, they spoke for over two hours last night, face to face, so I think — we have a strong relationship with a strong ally. There are areas that they discussed last night, some of which they agree and some of which they disagree. And as I’ve said, those talks are ongoing. And — but the conversation was honest and straightforward.
Q Just one follow on that. Particularly on the issue of settlements, what did the President ask of the Prime Minister, and how do you think that went?
MR. GIBBS: Well, I’m, at this point, not going to get into walking through the substance of what they discussed.
Yes, ma’am.
Q On the confidence-building measures, the Prime Minister made clear going into the meeting that he had no intention of backing down on the demand for freezing construction in East Jerusalem. And I’m wondering if there were any goodwill gestures or any concessions made?
MR. GIBBS: Again, I’m not going to get into the substance of what they talked about at each of the meetings. Again, we have asked the Prime Minister to take steps to build confidence for proximity talks to be able to make progress.
Q But can you explain why there were two meetings?
MR. GIBBS: Again, there was a meeting — the original meeting, the President — at the conclusion of that meeting, Prime Minister Netanyahu wanted not to leave but instead meet with staff — his staff here, his team here. They did so in the Oval Office [sic]. At some point, I don’t know exact timing, but at some point, they came — word was sent out of that meeting that the Prime Minister would like to see the President — requested to see the President again, and the —
Q Were there any presidential aides in the Roosevelt Room at the time?
MR. GIBBS: Not in the Roosevelt Room, no. I believe somebody was sent out to locate us.
Q So the Prime Minister met with the staff in the Roosevelt Room?
MR. GIBBS: With his staff, yes, yes — in the Roosevelt Room.
Q Does the President expect to see Netanyahu again today or tomorrow maybe?
MR. GIBBS: There’s nothing on the schedule right now, no. I think Prime Minister Netanyahu has some meetings scheduled later on today with administration staff. But there’s nothing on the schedule for —
Q But that’s here or —
Q But does he expect answers from Netanyahu?
MR. GIBBS: Oh, I don’t know if there — I don’t know exactly where those meetings are.
Q But does he expect answers from Netanyahu before he leaves town tonight or tomorrow?
MR. GIBBS: Again, the conversations that the Prime Minister and the President are having are ongoing.
Q Robert, Israel is confirming further plans to expand housing in East Jerusalem. Do you have any comment on that?
MR. GIBBS: I asked — specifically asked our team on this. They said they are seeking clarification on that announcement. And I will withhold comment until we have clarification based on some questions they have for the Israelis on that. I would say this: I think our position is fairly well known.”
http://www.truthusa.com/IRAN.html
#
Quote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2479995/posts
Gates expresses “concern” over Iranian drones
AFP (via Google.com) ^ | March 25, 2010 (3 hours ago) | n/a
Posted on March 25, 2010 6:20:15 PM PDT by Cindy
(AFP) – 3 hours ago WASHINGTON — US Defense Secretary Robert Gates expressed concern Thursday over Iran’s aerial drone program, saying the weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
ADDING to post no. 87:
http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=171846
“Obama demands Netanyahu’s peace answers by Saturday”
By HERB KEINON AND KHALED ABU TOAMEH
25/03/2010 23:57
SNIPPET: “Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will convene his senior ministers on Friday to discuss the demands made by US President Barack Obama and his overall trip to Washington – a trip that, because of negative atmospherics and amid a paucity of hard information, has been widely characterized as among the most difficult in recent memory.”