[andy58-in-nh]

The practice of "legislative entrenchment" (the practice by which a legislature insulates ordinary statutes from repeal by a subsequent legislature) is broadly considered to be unconstitutional. In addition, textual, historical, and structural arguments appear to make a very compelling case against the constitutionality of legislative entrenchment.

One of the legal sources I discovered also made this comment:

"In particular, the Framers incorporated into the Constitution the traditional Anglo-American practice against legislative entrenchment, as evidenced by early comments by James Madison... Moreover, legislative entrenchment essentially would allow Congress to use majority rule to pass constitutional amendments."

[Recon Dad]

Thank you very much for the research. I would take that to mean that Reid will be shooting himself in the foot by trying to put something like this in the bill.
I think it will turn into the cause celebre insuring the bill will be repealed some time in the future, idiots.

[RipSawyer]

The whole damned thing is unconstitutional from start to finish!