Posted on 03/11/2010 8:25:03 AM PST by MichCapCon
An investigative series by the Grand Rapids Press in late 2008 exposed the wrenching and expensive process that Michigan public schools must go through to dismiss even the most troublesome of tenured public school teachers. Though a new state law is supposed to make this easier, critics argue that all of the strict teacher tenure protections will remain in place and that these are a far greater impediment to getting the job done.
But another proposed reform that would have tackled the tenure problem head-on barely passed the Republican-controlled state Senate late last year, when even two GOP senators sided with the Democrat minority to oppose it. That bill, Senate Bill 638, received exactly 20 votes - the minimum needed for Senate approval. It is now in the Democrat-controlled Michigan House and is not expected to receive further serious consideration.
In comparing the two options, Michael Van Beek, director of education policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, states that progress under the new law may be only hypothetical. In a recent essay, he waggishly describes the "13 easy steps" still needed to dismiss an "ineffective tenured teacher" in one typical school district. Steps 9-13 include more than a year of potential tenure administrative hoops to jump through — none of which have been changed by the new law.
A Senate Fiscal Agency memo defines what would have been Senate Bill 638's crucial change: "The bill would amend the teachers' tenure Act to add consistent ineffectiveness in teaching as a ground for the discharge or demotion of a teacher on continuing tenure."
While some might think that "consistent ineffectiveness" as a grounds for termination is a rather common-sense — almost obvious — standard to insert into the teacher tenure act, it is in fact a highly controversial hurdle for Michigan lawmakers to clear.
"The teachers union put up roadblocks," said Sen. Wayne Kuipers, R-Holland, telling the Grand Rapids Press on Dec. 24 why SB 638's tenure reforms were not going to be enacted. He was describing what stalled the bill in the House, but his words could equally apply to the bill's narrow escape from the Senate.
The Michigan Education Association, the state’s largest public school employee union, is the roadblock that Kuipers was speaking of. The union counts most Democrats among its tacit allies in the Legislature, and as such, a large majority of its financial support flows to that party's candidates. The MEA opposed SB 638 when the legislation barely passed the Senate and is a large reason why the bill is moribund in the House.
But the MEA's partisan preference for Democrats does not constitute an exclusive relationship.
Sen. Mike Nofs, R-Battle Creek, and Sen. Roger Kahn, R-Saginaw, are the two Republicans who refused to vote for SB 638. In a special election that elevated him to the Senate last fall, it was Nofs — not his Democrat opponent — who received the MEA recommendation and $5,600 in financial support from the union’s political action committee. Likewise, campaign accounts controlled by Kahn have received at least $3,350 from the union PAC since 2007.
Sen. Patty Birkholz, R-Saugatuck, is the sponsor of SB 638. Expressing her disappointment to the Grand Rapids Press that the reform would not become law, she told the newspaper that her bill had more teeth in it than the more modest reform that did pass.
One of Sen. Birkholz's major concerns is the large cost that a district must endure to get rid of bad apples in the classroom. She told the Press, "superintendents from Lansing to the Lakeshore tell me it remains difficult to dismiss an ineffective teacher who has tenure."
The Press's 2008 investigation demonstrates why.
The paper surveyed four years' worth of public records for the 31 school districts in Kent and Ottawa counties and found that 17 districts had parted ways with 29 tenured instructors during the period. Most of them had 10 or more years in the classroom and were accused of serious misdeeds and very poor performance.
But trying to fire a tenured teacher is often a very last resort in all but the worst cases because tenure revue battles can take as long a year and the district must pay the salary of the teacher — who is put on paid leave — during the process. And this does not count the legal costs — often large — incurred on the district to document and then prosecute the case.
To make the problem go away as quickly and cheaply as possible, the districts in the report often got the teacher to leave by agreeing to continued salary and benefit payments. The 17 districts paid $763,251 over the four year period to part ways with the 29 teachers.
In half of the cases examined, the districts also "glossed over the problem" after the teacher was gone by "shredding evidence, asking administrators not to speak about the reasons behind the departure or writing a positive letter of recommendation for the teacher" when the instructor applied for new work.
A few examples of reasons for the departures are detailed below. The Grand Rapids Press notes that the settlement costs listed arise from teachers being "paid to leave their jobs" and that in most cases they represent "what a district paid in salary and insurance coverage. …"
* A 19-year veteran choir teacher in Zeeland was cited for drinking at the job and an inappropriate relationship with a student. Settlement cost: $78,530. * A 37-year veteran high school teacher in Godwin Heights gave away answers to tests and engaged in other inappropriate conduct. The district wrote him a glowing recommendation extolling his "pride in the district" and the "sense of respect for learning" that he provided. Settlement cost: $58,240. * A music teacher in Grand Rapids with 5.5 years of experience was imprisoned after being charged with nine counts of criminal sexual conduct with his students. Settlement cost: $19,930. * A science teacher with 36 years of experience in West Ottawa was cited for "unsatisfactory evaluations" and giving out tests with correct answers highlighted. Settlement cost: $84,349. * A 22-year veteran Grand Haven high school teacher was repeatedly suspended. In one instance, he brought a knife to school to show students how to stab somebody "without getting it stuck in the victim's rib cage." Settlement cost: $35,000.
Contact information for all Michigan lawmakers is available here.
The problems of getting rid of marginally-performing or less public employees, especially teachers, are coming home to roost.
To call them “ineffective” is to miss entirely what the function of public schools is in the modern Progressive state.
They are extremely effective at what they do: identifying and destroying intellectual curiosity, and socializing children to accept arbitrary authority.
Public schools are unsalvageable.
“Maybe I’m wrong here, but I think we’re putting way too much emphasis on teachers and absolutely nothing on the students.”
No, you’re not wrong. They are just going after the teachers because they can. I teach in a state where tenure mostly means they renew your contract if there are not any problems. Still, if you are a teacher and you are in fact doing your job, it is a small measure of protection against arbitrary and unfair treatment from school administrators. And it is fair that they have a process they have to go through. I know some of the private sector types folks are reading this right now, and saying “I can get canned right now- why shouldn’t you?” Here’s why- in a lot of private sector jobs you can walk across the street and get another job just like it in a short time. Teaching jobs...not so much. Most hiring is done in the summer between school years, and positions available are based on available funding, not planned expansion or potential profit. (And our “teacher shortage” is mostly in parts of education nobody wants- inner city schools and special education- ironically where good people are needed most.) You may go quite awhile hunting a teaching job even when times are good. (And, that nepotism thing pops up sometimes- just human nature but if you apply at a school district where it goes on, if you don’t have the inside support, you don’t get the job.)
I think we need to to put more pressure on the students myself- my opinion is that public school would work a lot better if 1. we didn’t spare anyone’s self-esteem and 2. we set standards more akin to those of say, 1950 as far as academic rigor. No “Mickey Mouse” stuff and no “you passed anyway, ‘cause you are old enough.”
As the husband of a teacher, I'd agree.
Behavior that in my day would have resulted in suspension or expulsion is tolerated. At my wife's middle school, children regularly curse the teachers, disregard clear intsructions, scream and yell in the halls, throw food in the halls, and even hit the teachers.
Administration does nothing because "if the lessons were engaging the children wouldn't act like that". BS.
Her district has between 2 and 3 non-teaching employees for every classroom teacher. These administrative parasites are, not suprisingly, the major portion of the personnel budget. But do they do their job in enforcing discipline and managing the school ? No way. Any problems, they blame the teachers.
Want a treat ? Arrange to be a guest lecturer at an inner city school. You'll snap pretty quickly to where the problems are in education.
there are plenty of crappy socialist teachers, but the good ones must risk firing for going against insane programs that simply dont work, and need a bit of protection from admin fools...
my 'spouse of a conservative Christian' first grade teacher .02 rant...
Good post. I have several friends and family members who work as school teachers, and nearly all of them have experienced similar problems with students and the administration. The school my niece teaches at is especially bad. The principal there is more concerned with her toadies keeping her informed about what the other teachers are saying about her than actually supporting them in the classroom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.