Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV licence fee rises £3 to £145.50 despite BBC cutbacks
Daily Mail ^ | March 9, 2010 | Staff

Posted on 03/09/2010 6:43:25 AM PST by C19fan

The cost of the BBC licence fee will increase by 2 per cent to £145.50 from April 1, it was confirmed today.

The rise from £142.50 for the colour licence is part of a six-year BBC funding settlement agreed in 2007.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bbc; fee
The thought I would have to pay close to $200 a year for the "priviledge" of watching a more entertaining version of PBS would make my blood boil. Is the fee per TV or household?
1 posted on 03/09/2010 6:43:25 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan
that's bloody outrageous, I say balls to that.
2 posted on 03/09/2010 6:46:12 AM PST by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It is amazing what people abroad put up with. I used to say that if the government ever tried to impose that sort of fee in the USA there would be rioting and blood in the streets... but now I am not so sure. :(


3 posted on 03/09/2010 6:46:54 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The BBC has more than 300 highly paid executives.


4 posted on 03/09/2010 6:50:04 AM PST by GeronL (I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

People in this country are becoming sheep.


5 posted on 03/09/2010 6:50:33 AM PST by GeronL (I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It won’t take me much more of an increase in cable bill to simply throw the boob tube out the door.


6 posted on 03/09/2010 6:52:13 AM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It is said that you can judge a civilization by its prisons, but you can also judge its decline by its regulations................


7 posted on 03/09/2010 6:52:42 AM PST by Red Badger (Education makes people easy to lead, difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The only thing worth watching on the BBC would be the ‘Wit & Wisdom of Sir Winston Churchill’ and ‘The Best of Benny Hill’.


8 posted on 03/09/2010 6:56:05 AM PST by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

and yet yesterday the same BBC was demanding “free internet for all” as a Human Right....LOL!


9 posted on 03/09/2010 7:01:35 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Is it true that in Britain, one must have and pay for a license, in order to own a television set?...

Heard that a while ago, and was frankly amazed.

Has that always been the case?


10 posted on 03/09/2010 7:05:04 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Yes

Yes

Yes


11 posted on 03/09/2010 7:21:24 AM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
i>Is it true that in Britain, one must have and pay for a license, in order to own a television set?...

Has that always been the case?

They've also had radio license since 1922 which stopped in 1970. The TV license started in 1946.

But look at the bright side. Someone who is blind only has to pay half the normal television tax. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_license#United_Kingdom (yes, yes, I know, beware of wikipedia).

12 posted on 03/09/2010 7:29:04 AM PST by KarlInOhio (New Olympic tagline Shut up, Bob Costas. Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: caver

I’ve already trashed my satellite TV, I used the TV, but only to watch Netflix, and other sites, streaming video. I get my news from the internet and I would NEVER pay the government a tax to watch TV.


13 posted on 03/09/2010 7:32:18 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I say double the fee! And then give 80% of the funds to Top Gear!
14 posted on 03/09/2010 8:35:56 AM PST by Moltke (DOPE will get you 4 to 8 in the Big House - HOPE will get you 4 to 8 in the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Per household, based on the most expensive license (i.e. if you have a color and a B&W - yes, they still have 'em - you pay the color TV fee). BBC justifies the TV tax by not having any commercial advertising or sponsors ("made possible by a grant from..."). Part of the fee funds the TV-detector vans that monitors neighborhoods for homes with TVs (I don't know how) and bounces the info against the list of addresses that have paid the fee.

SatTV service is an additional cost.

I remember a news article many(, many) moons ago about a man who "modified" his TV so that it would not receive a signal nor could it be used for SatTV - he only wanted to use it as a VCR (that many moons ago) monitor, and didn't believe he should have to pay the TV Tax. Was ruled against because the original design of the TV was to receive the signal.

15 posted on 03/09/2010 8:37:04 AM PST by AF_Blue ("Are you guys ready? Let's roll!" - Todd Beamer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Is it true that in Britain, one must have and pay for a license, in order to own a television set?... Heard that a while ago, and was frankly amazed. Has that always been the case?

The licence fee (originally for radio, subsequently also for TV) was introduced by the then Conservative government in 1922. There had been a lot of debate about how to pay for the new medium, and it was decided early on that there would be no advertising. The closest analogy available was the then relatively-new telephone. Just as you paid the General Post Office a yearly rental for a phone line, so you would also pay the GPO a yearly rental for a 'wireless' line. Seemed to make sense at the time - and despite all that's happened in media development since, and many predictions of the license fee's imminent demise, a sucession of reviews over the years has always come to the conclusion, in their wisdom, that it's the least worst system.

16 posted on 03/09/2010 9:54:56 AM PST by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson