Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/07/2010 10:48:58 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sonofstrangelove

Take the F-22 Light!

That should be the choice.


2 posted on 03/07/2010 10:50:51 PM PST by freedumb2003 ( Tagline lost -- anyone seen it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar

JSF/F35 ping!


4 posted on 03/07/2010 10:51:25 PM PST by freedumb2003 ( Tagline lost -- anyone seen it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove
The U.S. Navy also has shortage of fighters, primarily F/A-18C/Ds

What about all the A/B models in the bone yard? I'm sure many have been cannibalized for parts, that being their final function, but I would be really surprised if they didn't keep a goodly number in deep storage, rather than "parts aircraft".

Good enough for smoking camel (drivers). Save the later models for Iran, or other nations with more advanced vehicles.

With You Know Who in the White House, those JSFs (F-35s) might be a while in coming.

8 posted on 03/07/2010 11:14:13 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

A couple of years ago, my wife and I went down to Beaufort, SC for an impromptu reunion for a bunch of us who served there in the 1960’s.

It was bittersweet at best.

One of the guys there was a Colonel who stayed in the Reserves and keeps up-to-date with aviation issues at HQMC. He opined that Marine aviation was on the way out. Too expensive.

I don’t agree, but I only get one vote.

I spent it on Scott Brown.


10 posted on 03/07/2010 11:22:07 PM PST by Former War Criminal (My senior Senator (who served in Vietnam) said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: magslinger

ping


14 posted on 03/07/2010 11:26:58 PM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

F-117N Refused.

A-12A Canceled.

F-22n Early in the ATF/NATF development, a Naval variant of the F-22 could have been developed. But wasn't.

15 posted on 03/07/2010 11:53:16 PM PST by Daaave (Veteran of the Psychic Wars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove
"Robotic systems could help mitigate this risk, but the Navy has resisted adopting pilot-less aircraft."

"Top Gun" BS Syndrome... What if the carrier JSF is a flop?

Salt air must corrode away what little brains wind up in the Navy...

16 posted on 03/07/2010 11:53:32 PM PST by TXnMA (D'Aleo re Hansen's "GISS" temperature database: "Non Gradus Anus Rodentum!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

24 posted on 03/08/2010 4:29:14 AM PST by magslinger (Cry MALAISE! and let slip the dogs of incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove
The naval fighter gap first appeared around 2006, when the Marines decommissioned two fighter squadrons flying F/A-18D and AV-8B, owing to unexpected fatigue issues.

Bullsh*t.

2006 was also the year that the USN retired the F-14 Tomcat. The Tomcat was supposed to stay in service until 2010, got decommissioned early because of the cost savings involved.

Initial production of the F/A-18E/F series focused too much on the 2-seater "F" variant as the Tomcat replacement. Had the Tomcat stayed in service until this year, the focus would have been on building single-seat "E" variants as replacements for about 1/3 or the F/A-18A/Cs. Those Legacy Bugs that were trapping out would then be rolled off to the Marines and Adversary (VFC-13) squadrons in a more "leisurely" manner to fly land-based for the remainder of their fatigue lives.
34 posted on 03/08/2010 3:38:50 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sonofstrangelove

Of course the DESTROYER IN CHIEF is just gleeful . . . and dreaming of other treasonous ways to destroy our military.


38 posted on 03/08/2010 11:01:50 PM PST by Quix (THOSE who worked to land us here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson