To: sonofstrangelove
Take the F-22 Light!
That should be the choice.
2 posted on
03/07/2010 10:50:51 PM PST by
freedumb2003
( Tagline lost -- anyone seen it?)
To: Jet Jaguar
4 posted on
03/07/2010 10:51:25 PM PST by
freedumb2003
( Tagline lost -- anyone seen it?)
To: sonofstrangelove
The U.S. Navy also has shortage of fighters, primarily F/A-18C/Ds What about all the A/B models in the bone yard? I'm sure many have been cannibalized for parts, that being their final function, but I would be really surprised if they didn't keep a goodly number in deep storage, rather than "parts aircraft".
Good enough for smoking camel (drivers). Save the later models for Iran, or other nations with more advanced vehicles.
With You Know Who in the White House, those JSFs (F-35s) might be a while in coming.
8 posted on
03/07/2010 11:14:13 PM PST by
El Gato
("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
To: sonofstrangelove
A couple of years ago, my wife and I went down to Beaufort, SC for an impromptu reunion for a bunch of us who served there in the 1960’s.
It was bittersweet at best.
One of the guys there was a Colonel who stayed in the Reserves and keeps up-to-date with aviation issues at HQMC. He opined that Marine aviation was on the way out. Too expensive.
I don’t agree, but I only get one vote.
I spent it on Scott Brown.
10 posted on
03/07/2010 11:22:07 PM PST by
Former War Criminal
(My senior Senator (who served in Vietnam) said so.)
To: magslinger
To: sonofstrangelove
F-117N Refused.
A-12A Canceled.
F-22n Early in the ATF/NATF development, a Naval variant of the F-22 could have been developed. But wasn't.
15 posted on
03/07/2010 11:53:16 PM PST by
Daaave
(Veteran of the Psychic Wars)
To: sonofstrangelove
"Robotic systems could help mitigate this risk, but the Navy has resisted adopting pilot-less aircraft." "Top Gun" BS Syndrome... What if the carrier JSF is a flop?
Salt air must corrode away what little brains wind up in the Navy...
16 posted on
03/07/2010 11:53:32 PM PST by
TXnMA
(D'Aleo re Hansen's "GISS" temperature database: "Non Gradus Anus Rodentum!")
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!
![](http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y38/lazuruslong/sonobuoy.jpg)
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
24 posted on
03/08/2010 4:29:14 AM PST by
magslinger
(Cry MALAISE! and let slip the dogs of incompetence.)
To: sonofstrangelove
The naval fighter gap first appeared around 2006, when the Marines decommissioned two fighter squadrons flying F/A-18D and AV-8B, owing to unexpected fatigue issues.
Bullsh*t.
2006 was also the year that the USN retired the F-14 Tomcat. The Tomcat was supposed to stay in service until 2010, got decommissioned early because of the cost savings involved.
Initial production of the F/A-18E/F series focused too much on the 2-seater "F" variant as the Tomcat replacement. Had the Tomcat stayed in service until this year, the focus would have been on building single-seat "E" variants as replacements for about 1/3 or the F/A-18A/Cs. Those Legacy Bugs that were trapping out would then be rolled off to the Marines and Adversary (VFC-13) squadrons in a more "leisurely" manner to fly land-based for the remainder of their fatigue lives.
To: sonofstrangelove
Of course the DESTROYER IN CHIEF is just gleeful . . . and dreaming of other treasonous ways to destroy our military.
38 posted on
03/08/2010 11:01:50 PM PST by
Quix
(THOSE who worked to land us here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson