To: ncalburt
I think Stupak has realized he cant trust them to change the abortion language after the fact. He said yesterday he didnt think the House would come close to passing the Senate bill on the promise of later reconciling the abortion language.
On another topic, I still dont understand how the House can pass a bill that originated in the Senate, since this is a revenue bill and revenue bills have to start in the House.
8 posted on
03/03/2010 10:49:13 PM PST by
freespirited
(We're not the Party of No. We're the Party of HELL NO!!!)
To: freespirited
I still dont understand how the House can pass a bill that originated in the Senate, since this is a revenue bill and revenue bills have to start in the House. Since when have they paid any attention to the Constitution?
37 posted on
03/03/2010 11:29:27 PM PST by
arista
To: freespirited
Yes, the pro-abortionists would not allow anti-abortion language in the Bill.
The Reconciliation Bill is simply a smoke screen to take the focus off the real issue, the House vote.
69 posted on
03/04/2010 4:18:55 AM PST by
fortheDeclaration
("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
To: freespirited
Constitution, schmonstitution.
That is a good question though!
74 posted on
03/04/2010 5:02:43 AM PST by
GatorGirl
(Eschew Socialism!)
To: freespirited
Pelosi said the abortion language couldn’t be fixed in reconciliation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson