Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
There was no anthrax letter in Florida. Evidence. Evidence. Evidence.

1. Evidence: The letter left a trail of spores in postal facilities from Trenton to Florida, first going to the post office that had served the closed offices of the Enquirer, from where it was forward to AMI in Boca Raton.

2. Evidence: The strain of anthrax is identical to that used in the New York and Washington DC mailings.

3. Evidence: Stephanie Dailey remembers opening a letter that contained powder. She opens the mail addressed to the Enquirer.

4. Evidence: Stephanie Dailey tested positive for exposure to anthrax.

5. Evidence: The area around Stephanie Dailey's desk was the most contaminated area in the building.

6. Evidence: The building was thoroughly contaminated. The idea that this could have happened as a result of traces of anthrax on money is preposterous.

7. Evidence: Ernesto Blanco delivered the mail. He contracted anthrax.

8. Evidence: The letter that Stephanie Dailey opened arrived at the time a letter mailed together with the New York letters would have arrived.

Do you have any evidence at all to support your theory? Or do you feel that your beliefs are evidence and override all facts which dispute your beliefs?

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

22 posted on 03/05/2010 1:36:10 PM PST by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake

You keep mentioning a Florida “letter,” but there wasn’t one.

Still isn’t. You are pretending that a letter exists that never did.

Weak.


23 posted on 03/05/2010 1:38:31 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson