Skip to comments.
Please FREEP this poll - GUN CONTROL - Sonoma County, Calif.
Santa Rosa Press Democrat ^
| 3/3/2010
| GunsandBibles
Posted on 03/03/2010 10:14:31 AM PST by GunsAndBibles
Should more controls be placed on gun ownership? Yes 38% Probably 8% No 52% Unsure 3%
Number of votes cast: 393
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; banglist; freep; freepthispoll; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Poll is 1/4 way down on right side. Sonoma is a liberal leaning county just north of San Francisco and Marin county. Note that even without a freep, 52% are AGAINST more gun laws; as if we don't have enough already in Calif.
Also, the Sonoma sheriff is now starting to check the fingerprint database for ALL detainees for immigration status. That now makes 11 of 58 Calif counties running the check. Story here:
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20100302/NEWS/100309896
To: GunsAndBibles
2
posted on
03/03/2010 10:15:44 AM PST
by
GunsAndBibles
(God save Calif. - 'cause it's gonna take a miracle.)
To: GunsAndBibles
It dropped a bit....needs freeping:
Should more controls be placed on gun ownership?
Yes 38%
Probably 8%
No 51%
Unsure 2%
Number of votes cast: 403
3
posted on
03/03/2010 10:16:34 AM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
To: GunsAndBibles
I love how the question is always framed as “more controls” vs. “status quo”. What about people who think what we already have is too much? OTOH, the meek wording helps shift more people into the most pro-gun column the poll DOES have, plus at least they didn’t split the good guy vote like they always do, to make sure THEY get the single most popular answer.
4
posted on
03/03/2010 10:16:58 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Still Thinking
There are 22,000 laws, but we still need “more controls”.
Effin loons.
5
posted on
03/03/2010 10:18:04 AM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
To: GunsAndBibles; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; Conspiracy Guy; NYC GOP Chick; MeekOneGOP; ...
6
posted on
03/03/2010 10:18:24 AM PST
by
scott0347
(Commander of the 0347th Lancer Brigade, Operator of the Immaculate Steamroller)
To: GunsAndBibles
7
posted on
03/03/2010 10:18:35 AM PST
by
Poser
(Enjoying Prime Rib for 58 Years!)
To: scott0347
Please don’t ping me to “Freep this Poll” threads. Thank you.
8
posted on
03/03/2010 10:19:28 AM PST
by
Neets
To: GunsAndBibles
Yes 35%
Probably 7%
No 56%
Unsure 2%
Number of votes cast: 449
9
posted on
03/03/2010 10:19:49 AM PST
by
South40
("Islam has a long tradition of tolerance." ~Hussein Obama, June 4, 2009, Cairo, Egypt)
To: Poser
10
posted on
03/03/2010 10:21:31 AM PST
by
GunsAndBibles
(God save Calif. - 'cause it's gonna take a miracle.)
To: Still Thinking
“I love how the question is always framed as more controls vs. status quo. “
It’s because libtards think gun controls do something about gun violence. Because they don’t, they look around and see that there’s still plenty of it around so we need more instead of getting a clue that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws have them.
11
posted on
03/03/2010 10:21:46 AM PST
by
dajeeps
To: GunsAndBibles
12
posted on
03/03/2010 10:22:19 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
(You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
To: dajeeps
They got a ratchet for a philosophy and a loose nut for a leader.
13
posted on
03/03/2010 10:24:06 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: GunsAndBibles
Love that 9% voting “probably” or “unsure.” Wonder why they would even bother giving the poll a click.
14
posted on
03/03/2010 10:24:45 AM PST
by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: Menehune56
They’re waiting for a popular consensus so they will know how to think correctly. Similar to a past President I can think of.
15
posted on
03/03/2010 10:28:48 AM PST
by
GunsAndBibles
(God save Calif. - 'cause it's gonna take a miracle.)
To: dajeeps
What I really hate is when pollster pose a question and the literally correct answer will be read the OPPOSITE of intended. Example: “Do you approve of George W. Bush’s job performance?” You’re screwed. You can’t put “No” because then they’ll count you (and use your vote to beat him with) as disapproving because he’s too CONSERVATIVE! But you can’t say “Yes” either because that means you think he’s doing the right thing. D’oh!
16
posted on
03/03/2010 10:29:20 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: GunsAndBibles
Hey, at least sink boy cared what the public thought and would back off ideas everybody hated. I’d trade Zero for him tomorrow.
17
posted on
03/03/2010 10:30:12 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Menehune56
Love that 9% voting probably or unsure. Wonder why they would even bother giving the poll a click. It's for the "I'm too F-ing stoopid to vote" morons.
18
posted on
03/03/2010 10:30:29 AM PST
by
Cobra64
To: Cobra64
They probably just clicked on that option when their finger twitched on the mouse. Gore votes that went to Buchanan, IOW.
19
posted on
03/03/2010 10:31:36 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: GunsAndBibles
Yes 30%
Probably 6%
No 61%
Unsure 2%
Number of votes cast: 541
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson