[allmendream]

She is a truther if, eight years after the fact, she entertains in her deluded little head that ‘no NYC police officers died in the WTC’, and thought that this salient ‘fact’ illustrated how it was completely reasonable to ‘have questions’.

If a person still “have questions” about the most studied and documented event in modern history, that person is a truther and a nutjob.

Even if you think the federal government had the motive/intention to kill 3,000 Americans and bring down the WTC (and I would like for you to explain what possible motive there would be for me, but somehow I doubt that you will); it is an entirely different thing to suppose, for even a second, that they had the capability to keep it secret.

If someone thinks the government had motive; they are paranoid.

If someone thinks the government had the capability; they are delusional.

Paranoid delusionals are not often thought of as viable candidates for Governorships.

[bravedog]

I think that the original question was valid, even though highly improbable. Obviously, the federal government didn’t play a part, but the question deserved to be asked. There a still questions on whether other world governments played a part, so there ARE still questions that the feds have not answered.

I would like to point out that if you think that Medina’s Jefferson philosophies will harm Texas, then that makes you paranoid. If you think that DC will stop spending your money or intruding on states’ rights, then that makes you delusional. Maybe you should run for governor?