Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

I think that the original question was valid, even though highly improbable. Obviously, the federal government didn’t play a part, but the question deserved to be asked. There a still questions on whether other world governments played a part, so there ARE still questions that the feds have not answered.

I would like to point out that if you think that Medina’s Jefferson philosophies will harm Texas, then that makes you paranoid. If you think that DC will stop spending your money or intruding on states’ rights, then that makes you delusional. Maybe you should run for governor?


35 posted on 03/02/2010 2:01:22 PM PST by bravedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: bravedog
Oh, so no explanation as to a possible motive?

Expected, as the reason most truthers are flaming liberals is that they think the motive was “War for Oil”.

If, eight years later, a person still ‘has questions’; that person is a moron.

I think Medina being an unqualified loon would harm (if she were elected), not just Texas, but the Republican Party, and the nation.

But nice attempt at trying to paint me as against Jeffersonian governance. I guess when someone is a paranoid delusional truther who cannot answer simple questions as to possible motives, mischaracterization is one of the few avenues of attack available.

36 posted on 03/02/2010 2:06:18 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson