[murron]

Higher IQs than what? Worms?

[gleeaikin]

This parallels a recent study report that said students at religious/fundamentalist colleges have lower SAT scores.

[bitterohiogunclinger]

“Religion, the current theory goes, did not help people survive or reproduce necessarily, but goes along the lines of helping people to be paranoid, Kanazawa said. Assuming that, for example, a noise in the distance is a signal of a threat helped early humans to prepare in case of danger.”

Religious or Atheist question aside, Liberals do not prepare for danger, they whine and cry and insist that danger does not exist, except for evil conservatives. The only “evolutionary” advantage they have ever had is that we have not choked them to death yet, because for the most part, our religion prohibits it.

[achilles2000]

“The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines “liberal” in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people.”

DOES ANYBODY READ? Above is the money quote. The DEFINITION OF “LIBERAL” is an American Christian. Who do you think shows more concern for genetically unrelated people by donating private resources? The data are unambiguous. Moreover, atheists in every report I have seen give relatively little voluntarily. The “study” is bizarre, and even CNN ought to be able recognize that there is something wrong.

[BobL]

Of course Liberals have higher IQs than conservatives.

After all, liberals want to criminalize free thinking and put conservatives who still speak out in concentration camps - or worse (as they’ve done throughout history), and conservatives simply cannot seem to grasp that, and instead they look at politics as a football game, win some, lose some, but all shake hands in the end.

Bottom line, if you’re not able to understand your enemy, you will be DEFEATED time and time again.