Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: murron; kingattax; Soothesayer; TigerBait; gleeaikin; freeangel; ImJustAnotherOkie; ...

“The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines “liberal” in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people.”

DOES ANYBODY READ? Above is the money quote. The DEFINITION OF “LIBERAL” is an American Christian. Who do you think shows more concern for genetically unrelated people by donating private resources? The data are unambiguous. Moreover, atheists in every report I have seen give relatively little voluntarily. The “study” is bizarre, and even CNN ought to be able recognize that there is something wrong.


60 posted on 02/28/2010 8:31:31 AM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: achilles2000

>> DOES ANYBODY READ?

It also says they “had” higher IQs.


63 posted on 02/28/2010 8:33:08 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: achilles2000

Sometimes I feel like spouting off nonsense before reading or listening. Could I be a closet Liberal?


78 posted on 02/28/2010 9:42:23 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: achilles2000

I was the only other person to notice that line. Sheesh.


93 posted on 02/28/2010 1:14:31 PM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson