[Beckwith]

The birth announcements are irrelevant.

They would never be accepted in any court as evidence of anything.

[jamese777]

The birth announcements are irrelevant.

They would never be accepted in any court as evidence of anything.

---

Yes they would.
The birth announcements constitute corroborating evidence of the parents’ home address in Honolulu and thus in the United States that is listed on the original birth vital records. Since they appeared a week after Obama’s birth date, they also help to corroborate when he was born as well as where he was born.
An Obama defense attorney or a US Justice Department Attorney representing Obama would be a fool not to introduce into evidence those August 13 and 14th, 1961 birth announcements.

[EnderWiggins]

Actually, yeah they would. They are corroborating evidence which would certainly be accepted in a court.

[butterdezillion]

Right. But it could well be that the birth announcements will show us who else has been willing to lie for Obama. And that could open a whole ‘nother (very deserving) can of worms.