Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Concerning the birth certificate numbers, I don't see anything very mysterious there. These certificate numbers were issued as the forms were processed by hand by several different clerks. So clerk Number one may have been given the twins to process and another clerk may have been given Obama’s. We don't know the size of the stacks they were working on or the speed at which they worked. Or even if clerk number one took a day of sick leave. It means nothing that Obama’s number is apparently out of sequence.

As far as the newspaper in question, if someone will tell me which newspaper in Hawaii it was, I will let everyone know how which library's accross the country have copies on either microfilm or microfiche and people can begin a comparison process. It could be hundreds.

Splicing film or fiche is not so easy because the print is so very tiny. Altering a printout or scan from the film or fiche is much easier.

44 posted on 02/27/2010 8:21:54 PM PST by Walvoord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Walvoord

That sounds reasonable to me.


46 posted on 02/27/2010 8:33:13 PM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Walvoord
So clerk Number one may have been given the twins to process and another clerk may have been given Obama’s. We don't know the size of the stacks they were working on or the speed at which they worked. Or even if clerk number one took a day of sick leave. It means nothing that Obama’s number is apparently out of sequence.

They're only three digits off. There are a million things that could account for that. The clerk could've accidentally dropped the week's applications and picked them back up, stacked 'em up and gone from top to bottom.

It'd be different if they were 100s of digits off. Three digits is nothing.

80 posted on 03/01/2010 10:39:21 AM PST by Terabitten (Vets wrote a blank check, payable to the Constitution, for an amount up to and including their life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Walvoord

It’s not the birth dates and cert#’s that pose the problem. What poses the problem is that the “Date filed” is the date that the state registrar gave the cert number - and the Factcheck one was filed (given a number) 3 days earlier than the Nordykes’ but has a later number. Even if a BC was sitting in a pile somewhere it wouldn’t be given a number until the “date filed”. So piles don’t affect this anomaly at all.


103 posted on 03/03/2010 6:33:21 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson