Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2010 2:11:33 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

“it does not expect it to reach a hugely different conclusion about the impact of global warming.”

What?! You mean, we’re suppose to trust these yokels even though they’ll come to the same conclusion about global warming as the fraudsters?!


2 posted on 02/24/2010 2:14:53 PM PST by McKayopectate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
it does not expect it to reach a hugely different conclusion

So much for drawing a conclusion from the data.

3 posted on 02/24/2010 2:17:03 PM PST by Hazwaste (Some people are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Here's the reason why: "the public's belief in global warming has plummeted from 41 per cent to 26 per cent."

And here's the foregone conclusion: " . . . does not expect it to reach a hugely different conclusion about the impact of global warming. "

Of course, what is NOT stated in this article is that the CRU claims all the early data has been lost and the only remaining data is the massaged data. Thus, they are starting with tainted data and can only expect to arrive at a tainted conclusion. The fact that they neglect to mention this problem guarantees that the conclusion cited above is the one which will be reached.

Q.E.D.

5 posted on 02/24/2010 2:18:41 PM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Exactly. The climate data has been so screwed up because of politics we don’t know who is on first. This group apparently thinks the same way and are starting all over again. Of course our dimoKKKRAT Congress and Obama is still going full speed as if nothing has happened.


6 posted on 02/24/2010 2:20:08 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The Met Office doesn't get it. John Christy at UAH directly stated that the records, and particularly the more recent ones, are contaminated by urbanization and all kinds of artifacts, and are therefore worthless.

They can analyze the data 100 more times if they want to; it's still worthless. For all intents and purposes, a truly accurate and reliable long term temperature data set doesn't even exist.

8 posted on 02/24/2010 2:27:48 PM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

150 years of data... hmmmm

just a fart in the earth’s carbon footprint...

t


9 posted on 02/24/2010 2:28:09 PM PST by teeman8r (anarchy is preferred over tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“Let us construct bigger and better lies to steal your freedom with”.

LLS


12 posted on 02/24/2010 2:31:28 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“But the reassessment by an international group of experts will be seen by many as a tacit admission that its previous reports have been tainted by its association with the University of East Anglia’s disgraced Climatic Research Unit.”

Anything, or any person, associated with the UN is disgraced.


13 posted on 02/24/2010 2:44:30 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
It says that the reanalysis, which was approved at a conference in Turkey earlier this week, is 'timely' and it does not expect it to reach a hugely different conclusion about the impact of global warming.

Photobucket

17 posted on 02/24/2010 2:54:15 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
How convenient to take such a tiny piece of time - 150 yrs - conveniently omitting the “Warming period” of about 500 years (800-1300) and the Little Ice Age (about 1300-1850)

We wouldn't want to let the whole picture get in our way. We wouldn't want to examine how those Vikings caused globel warming running around in their SUV’s - or was it gas guzzling Viking Ships?

the History Channel had an excellent movie a few years ago: The Little Ice Age - which, curiously, seems to have disappeared off their web site??? The DVD has been discontinued by History but some can still be found on Amazon. (I just ordered the book version along with the book “The Long Summer” which chronicles the period just preceding the Little Ice Age. VHS tapes are gone, DVD’s will change to a newer version - but books will be books for decades and decades.)

There are some snippets of The Little Ice age on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpZqAPmW6d0

and remember 30 years ago the politicians and scientist were panicking us with the fast encroaching and catastrophic ice age - starvation in 10 years...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttLBqB0qDko&NR=1&feature=fvwp

below: the sun TODAY - one tiny sunspot - sunspot activity has coincided with warming/cooling trends for millenia. We have had an unusual - and disheartening - lack of sunspot for the past few years...

http://spaceweather.com/images2010/24feb10/midi512_blank.gif?PHPSESSID=o0dfsj22gsfjsp32ct9rdblcq5

19 posted on 02/24/2010 3:58:54 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; Genesis defender; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

21 posted on 02/24/2010 4:10:21 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Mo’ taxpayer money for these idiots to squandered. These jerks should all be fired and forget about the rest. They should feel lucky they don’t get thrown in prison


23 posted on 02/24/2010 4:29:05 PM PST by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I’m betting this re-examination of the data will show that global warming is even worse than we thought. (Hey, if you’re going to tell a lie, tell a BIG one)


24 posted on 02/24/2010 4:33:48 PM PST by I Shall Endure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
It says that the reanalysis, which was approved at a conference in Turkey earlier this week, is 'timely' and it does not expect it to reach a hugely different conclusion about the impact of global warming.
Thanks neverdem. Sickening.
25 posted on 02/24/2010 6:35:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (February 23, 1945 -- Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If he messed with anything, it was from 1980 to 2008. That would give him a respectable hockey stick.

Paul


26 posted on 02/24/2010 10:50:03 PM PST by Paul Pierett (Paul Pierett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If he messed with anything, it was from 1980 to 2008. That would give him a respectable hockey stick.

Paul


27 posted on 02/24/2010 10:51:02 PM PST by Paul Pierett (Paul Pierett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson