FWIW, I agree with you on that.
Of course Ron Paul is more of a Bircher than he is a "straight-up Libertarian".
Of course Ron Paul is more of a Bircher than he is a "straight-up Libertarian". And that's darn well a good thing.
John Birch is a hero of Christian missionary work in China, and the Society which bears his name is proud to offer the Right fusion between the two Conservative Ideals of Traditionalism and Libertarianism, in their annual Freedom Index -- which Ron Paul is consistently-high-ranked.
I'm not a member of the John Birch Society, but I admire their namesake and their founding ideals. If that puts me in Ron Paul's company (and, yeah, I know it does)... then I say: Bircher, and Proud.
Pro-Life, Pro-Border Security, Pro-Capitalism, and Pro-Constitution. Oh, and Pro-Sarah Palin and Pro-Rand Paul.
If this be "RonPaulist Treason"... then make the most of it.
Ron Paul is for Ron Paul.
He is not a Republican.