See post 33 and tell me if you can agree with it?
Conservative and Liberal are about issues and principles of liberty, not orientation.
“CONSERVATIVE gays would be focused on issues of personal liberties and privacy,”
The Gay agenda is primarily to force recognition (by any means necessary) of something that the majority of America does not want...marriage, for instance, which has been universally defeated.
The “mainstreaming” of Gays has also broadened to include Transsexuals (who I consider to be the self-mutilated) and “Bi-Sexuals” whatever the hell that is...so, in my opinion, as far as personal liberty goes, true, it is a priority for the GLBT tribe, but only for them, not for society. Their plea that homosexuality is not a preference, but predestination, I think, is proven a red herring by their inclusion of the other two and I really don’t see where it logically ends. I think it ultimately destructive to society.
They would be great to have on my side if I were a Libertarian or an Anarchist, but not for me, as I consider myself a very traditional Conservative. Just my opinion.
The radical definition of liberty is "anything goes"; whereas traditional conservatives are "oriented" towards the long-term, i.e. their children and children's children.
While adoption and semi-parenting are possible for gays, assisted reproduction is at least 50% diluted from a true, bloodline connection to the fate of one's progeny that the naturally reproductive citizen experiences. Natural reproduction is a powerful social forcem-- a force of "Nature and Nature's God" -- more powerful than any sexual fetish posing as an "orientation."