[presidio9]

Ask yourself this simple question: Which of us is more able to speak to undecided and independent voters to get them to vote our way? After all, you’ve made it clear you apply an remarkably narrow ideological purity test before accepting like-minded people as your allies.

The next liberaltarian I meet who has the faintest idea how the two-party system works will be the first. We're mot trying to get the Conservative Party candidate elected here. He wouldn't get enough votes. We stand behind the Republican candidate, but we do everything in our power to make sure that that Republican candidate agrees with us on as many conservative positions as possible.

If I were a libertarian, I'd be doing the same thing. I just wouldn't be doing on a Conservative forum, where 98% of the members disagree with me.

And, BTW, most libertarians believe in a woman's so-called "right" to choose. There is no more narrow-minded political position in the history of the human race. Including slavery and the "Final Solution."

You can "asipire" to anything you like. You just can't do it here.

[xdem]

And, BTW, most libertarians believe in a woman's so-called "right" to choose. There is no more narrow-minded political position in the history of the human race. Including slavery and the "Final Solution."

Most libertarians? Really? Have you polled them?

Had you read my earlier posts, you'd see clearly that I'm Pro-Life.

Further, even Ron Paul, who you attack without doing even basic research, is Pro-Life as well.